ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2008
Use of PCR-based Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotyping to prioritize tuberculosis outbreak control activities.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of a semiautomated commercial repetitive-sequence-based PCR method with spoligotyping, 24-locus mycobacterial interspersed repetitive-unit-variable-number tandem-repeat typing, and restriction fragment length polymorphism-based analysis of IS6110 for Mycobacterium tuberculosis typing.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2014Article
- Shared Mycobacterium avium genotypes observed among unlinked clinical and environmental isolates.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2013Article
- Polymerase chain reaction: A molecular diagnostic tool in periodontology.Journal of Indian Society of PeriodontologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Genotypic analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates is increasingly applied in direct support of tuberculosis outbreak control activities. This is facilitated by PCR-based strain typing methods that enable the genotypic characterization of samples containing small numbers of M. tuberculosis cells. By using DNA extracted directly from primary diagnostic cultures, PCR-based methods were applied to a tuberculosis outbreak investigation and to surveillance in King County, Washington. In the outbreak investigation, five epidemiologically linked M. tuberculosis isolates had a unique pattern at mycobacterial interspersed repeating unit (MIRU) loci 10 and 23 when the pattern was compared to the patterns in a local MIRU locus database. In order to quickly identify new cases involving this strain (termed SBRI10), targeted genotyping at these two loci was performed with cultures from epidemiologically associated tuberculosis cases. Isolates with the characteristic genotypes at loci 10 and 23 were further analyzed by use of a 12-locus MIRU panel and by repetitive-unit-sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR). Between May 2004 and January 2005, 82 cases were screened, of which 14 were identified for further analysis and 13 were confirmed to be infected with SBRI10. Between September 2005 and August 2006, surveillance universal genotyping was performed by using the 12-locus MIRU panel with DNA from primary diagnostic enrichment cultures. A total of 161 samples were submitted for analysis, and 156 were successfully typed. Fifty-one cases formed 18 presumptive clusters by MIRU locus typing. Of these, 30 cases were confirmed to be members of 11 clusters by rep-PCR. Presumptive genotypic data were available rapidly, sometimes within 2 weeks of diagnosis. In this fashion, PCR-based genotyping provided data that can be used to prioritize disease control activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.