Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18172569›Full record

ReviewArchives of virology2008

Cellular binding partners of the human papillomavirus E6 protein.

Sandy S Tungteakkhun, Penelope J Duerksen-Hughes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of virology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. DARPin-induced reactivation of p53 in HPV-positive cells.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Viruses in colorectal cancer.Molecular oncology · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The Journal of biological chemistry · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sandy S TungteakkhunDepartment of Basic Sciences, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.
Penelope J Duerksen-Hughes

Funding

Inhibition of the TNF Apoptotic Pathway by HPV 16 E6R01CA095461 · NCI · LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY · PI DUERKSEN-HUGHES, PENELOPE J · 2003 to 2007
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high-risk strains of human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) are known to be causative agents of cervical cancer and have recently also been implicated in cancers of the oropharynx. E6 is a potent oncogene of HR-HPVs, and its role in the progression to malignancy has been and continues to be explored. E6 is known to interact with and subsequently inactivate numerous cellular proteins pivotal in the mediation of apoptosis, transcription of tumor suppressor genes, maintenance of epithelial organization, and control of cell proliferation. Binding of E6 to these proteins cumulatively contributes to the oncogenic potential of HPV. This paper provides an overview of these cellular protein partners of HR-E6, the motifs known to mediate oncoprotein binding, and the agents that have the potential to interfere with E6 expression and activity and thus prevent the subsequent progression to oncogenesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisCell AdhesionCell PolarityCell ProliferationChromosomal InstabilityFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16HumansOncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomavirus InfectionsProtein BindingRepressor ProteinsTranscription, GeneticTumor Suppressor Protein p53Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsE6 protein, Human papillomavirus type 16Oncogene Proteins, ViralRepressor ProteinsTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID18172569
PMCPMC2249614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.