Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18171468›Full record

ArticleBMC neuroscience2008

Amiloride-sensitive channels in type I fungiform taste cells in mouse.

Aurelie Vandenbeuch, Tod R Clapp, Sue C Kinnamon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neuroscience, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 262 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Bitter taste receptors.Chemical senses · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Mimicking the Biological Sense of Taste In Vitro Using a Taste Organoids-on-a-Chip System.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. The avian taste system.Frontiers in physiology · 2023
    Review
  16. Observational
  17. Taste Receptor Signaling.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aurelie VandenbeuchDepartment of Biomedical Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, USA. aurelie.vandenbeuch@colostate.edu
Tod R Clapp
Sue C Kinnamon
Colorado State University · US

Funding

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY OF TASTE TRANSDUCTIONR01DC000766 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KINNAMON, SUE C. · 1990 to 2009
$2.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC00766NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTaste buds are the sensory organs of taste perception. Three types of taste cells have been described. Type I cells have voltage-gated outward currents, but lack voltage-gated inward currents. These cells have been presumed to play only a support role in the taste bud. Type II cells have voltage-gated Na+ and K+ current, and the receptors and transduction machinery for bitter, sweet, and umami taste stimuli. Type III cells have voltage-gated Na+, K+, and Ca2+ currents, and make prominent synapses with afferent nerve fibers. Na+ salt transduction in part involves amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channels (ENaCs). In rodents, these channels are located in taste cells of fungiform papillae on the anterior part of the tongue innervated by the chorda tympani nerve. However, the taste cell type that expresses ENaCs is not known. This study used whole cell recordings of single fungiform taste cells of transgenic mice expressing GFP in Type II taste cells to identify the taste cells responding to amiloride. We also used immunocytochemistry to further define and compare cell types in fungiform and circumvallate taste buds of these mice.

resultsTaste cell types were identified by their response to depolarizing voltage steps and their presence or absence of GFP fluorescence. TRPM5-GFP taste cells expressed large voltage-gated Na+ and K+ currents, but lacked voltage-gated Ca2+ currents, as expected from previous studies. Approximately half of the unlabeled cells had similar membrane properties, suggesting they comprise a separate population of Type II cells. The other half expressed voltage-gated outward currents only, typical of Type I cells. A single taste cell had voltage-gated Ca2+ current characteristic of Type III cells. Responses to amiloride occurred only in cells that lacked voltage-gated inward currents. Immunocytochemistry showed that fungiform taste buds have significantly fewer Type II cells expressing PLC signalling components, and significantly fewer Type III cells than circumvallate taste buds.

conclusionThe principal finding is that amiloride-sensitive Na+ channels appear to be expressed in cells that lack voltage-gated inward currents, likely the Type I taste cells. These cells were previously assumed to provide only a support function in the taste bud.

Indexed as

AmilorideAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationElectric StimulationFemaleGreen Fluorescent ProteinsIon Channel GatingMaleMembrane PotentialsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicNeuronsPatch-Clamp TechniquesPhospholipase C betaReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledAmilorideGreen Fluorescent ProteinsPhospholipase C betaReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSodium Channel BlockersSynaptosomal-Associated Protein 25Taste Receptors, Type 2TRPM5 protein, humanTrpm5 protein, mouseTRPM Cation Channels

Identifiers

PMID18171468
PMCPMC2235881
OpenAlexW2008002043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.