Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18165849›Full record

ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2008

Memory complaints to the general practitioner: data from the GuidAge study.

N Coley, P J Ousset, S Andrieu, H Matheix Fortunet, B Vellas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Preventing cognitive decline in healthy older adults.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2013
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

N ColeyInserm, U558, F-31073, Toulouse, France.
P J Ousset
S Andrieu
H Matheix Fortunet
B Vellas
Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées · FRInserm · FRIpsen (France) · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory complaints are relatively common in elderly people, although they are not always reported to the general practitioner (GP). These subjective complaints do not necessarily correlate with objective measures of memory impairment or cognitive performance, but they may be an early indication of impairment at a state that is undetectable by standard testing instruments. Memory complaints may also predict future cognitive decline. The GuidAge study is a secondary prevention trial for Alzheimer's disease involving non-demented individuals aged 70 years or older having spontaneously complained of memory problems to their GP. More than half of participants had a Clinical Dementia Rating score of 0.5 at baseline. The percentage of participants reporting problems on the McNair and Kahn scale varied from 6.2% to 78.6% per item. Certain specific memory complaints may be more related than others to the beginning of the neurodegenerative process, and could predict future cognitive decline. The importance of memory complaints should not be underestimated in clinical practice.

Indexed as

CognitionAgedAlzheimer DiseaseDementiaDepressive DisorderFemaleForecastingHumansMaleMemory DisordersPhysicians, FamilyPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID18165849
OpenAlexW2085536568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.