Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18165834›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2008

Apparently non-specific results found using a norovirus antigen immunoassay for fecal specimens from neonates.

C Wiechers, A L Bissinger, K Hamprecht, P Kimmig, G Jahn, C F Poets

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Noroviruses - State of the Art.Food and environmental virology · 2010
    Article
  4. Two nosocomial norovirus outbreaks in the neonatal intensive and intermediate care unit.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2009
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C WiechersDepartment of Neonatology, University Children's Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany.
A L Bissinger
K Hamprecht
P Kimmig
G Jahn
C F Poets
University of Tübingen · DEUniversity Children's Hospital Tübingen · DEBaden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Norovirus is increasingly recognized as a frequent cause of non-bacterial gastroenteritis. Despite a 10-fold increase in the number of cases reported following the availability of enzyme immunoassays, there are no reports yet from preterm neonates. We report on a sudden clustering of antigen-positive enzyme immuno assays results in a level III neonatal intensive care unit, involving 22 of 43 infants screened. Although antigen-positive samples were significantly associated with bloody stools (P<0.001) and gastric residues (P<0.02), norovirus infection could not be confirmed by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction or electron microscopy. We question the validity of the so called norovirus-specific antigen assays and warn against overreacting to positive enzyme immunoassays results without reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction confirmation especially in the neonatal setting.

Indexed as

Caliciviridae InfectionsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFalse Positive ReactionsFecesGastroenteritisGermanyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, NeonatalNorovirusReagent Kits, DiagnosticReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID18165834
OpenAlexW1976793265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.