Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18165830›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2008

Clinical reliability and validity of the N-PASS: neonatal pain, agitation and sedation scale with prolonged pain.

P Hummel, M Puchalski, S D Creech, M G Weiss

7 registry-linked trialsAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 7 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 142 papers, 21 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed, 21 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02152046 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Retinopathy of Prematurity Screening: Comparison of Pain Using Two Eyelid Retractors

TypeobservationalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2014 to 2024Enrolled44ConditionsPain During ROP ExamArmsROP exam with spring loaded retractor, ROP exam with screw retractor
NCT02434432 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Music Therapy as a Method of Non-Pharmacological Pain Management in the NICU Setting

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmerican University of Beirut Medical CenterRan2014 to 2015Enrolled40ConditionsMusic TherapyArmsmusic therapy selected by mothers, Music therapy recorded lullaby
NCT04528030 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

WAVE Trial in Premature Infants With Apnea of Prematurity Using a Simple, Non-invasive Vibratory Device to Study the Effectiveness in Supporting Breathing and General Stability

TypeinterventionalSponsorInspiration HealthcareRan2021 to 2022Enrolled17ConditionsApnea of Newborn, Hypoxia Neonatal, Bradycardia NeonatalArmsWAVE device
NCT04643730 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Randomised Controlled Study: The Effects on Pain of Foot Reflexology and Acupressure During Heel Lancing In Newborns

TypeinterventionalSponsorEskisehir Osmangazi UniversityRan2017 to 2018Enrolled105ConditionsInterventions PainArmsAcupressure methods, Foot Reflexology Methods, Control Grup
NCT06150586 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The PALISA Study - Pain Assessment During Less-Invasive-Surfactant-Administration

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ZurichRan2023 to 2024Enrolled21ConditionsInfant, Premature, Diseases, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Surfactant Deficiency Syndrome Neonatal, PainArmsSkin Conductance (SC) Measurement, Video Recording
NCT06163586 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Neonatal Therapeutic Touch and Massage in Very Preterm and Extremely Preterm Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Maryland, BaltimoreRan2023 to 2025Enrolled32ConditionsNeonatal Prematurity, Massage TherapyArmsNeonatal Touch and Massage Therapy
NCT07081048 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The effect of buzzy® and shotbloker® application on the pain and comfort level of newborns during heel prick blood sampling in newborns

TypeinterventionalSponsorTarsus UniversityRan2025 to 2025Enrolled159ConditionsNewbornArmsBuzzy®.Group, ShotBlocker Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 21 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 410 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Midazolam for sedation of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Clinical rating scales for assessing pain in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Acupuncture for neonatal abstinence syndrome in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Acupuncture for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Positioning for lumbar puncture in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Positioning for lumbar puncture in newborn infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Systemic opioid regimens for postoperative pain in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Systemic opioid regimens for postoperative pain in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Opioids for newborn infants receiving mechanical ventilation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale's use, reliability, and validity: a systematic review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Clonidine for pain in non-ventilated infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Skin-to-skin care for procedural pain in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Guideline

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

P HummelLoyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, USA. phummel@lumc.edu
M Puchalski
S D Creech
M G Weiss
Loyola University Medical Center · USCTL Amedica (United States) · USMemorial Hospital of South Bend · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo establish beginning evidence of clinical validity and reliability of the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale (N-PASS) in neonates with prolonged pain postoperatively and during mechanical ventilation. STUDY

designProspective psychometric evaluation. Two nurses administered the N-PASS simultaneously and independently before and after pharmacologic interventions for pain or sedation. One nurse also administered the premature infant pain profile (PIPP) concurrently with the N-PASS. The setting consisted of 50-bed level III neonatal intensive care unit. Convenience sample of 72 observations of 46 ventilated and/or postoperative infants, 0 to 100 days of age, gestational age 23 to 40 weeks was used. Outcome measures comprised convergent and construct validity, interrater reliability and internal consistency.

resultInterrater reliability measured by intraclass coefficients of 0.85 to 0.95 was high (P<0.001 to 0.0001). Convergent validity was demonstrated by correlation with the PIPP scores (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient of 0.83 at high pain scores, 0.61 at low pain scores). Internal consistency, measured by Cronbach's alpha, was evident with pain scores (0.82), and with sedation scores (0.87). Construct validity was established via the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, comparing the distribution of N-PASS scores before and after pharmacologic intervention showing pain scores of 4.86 (3.38) and 1.81 (1.53) (mean (s.d.), P<0.0001) and sedation scores of 0.85 (1.66) and -2.78 (2.81) (P<0.0001) for pre- and postintervention assessments, respectively.

conclusionsThis research provides beginning evidence that the N-PASS is a valid and reliable tool for assessing pain/agitation and sedation in ventilated and/or postoperative infants 0 to 100 days of age, and 23 weeks gestation and above.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalNeuropsychological TestsPain MeasurementCohort StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleObserver VariationPostoperative CarePostoperative PainProcedural SedationPsychometricsPsychomotor Agitation

Identifiers

PMID18165830
OpenAlexW2049073164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 1 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.