ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2008
Evaluation of the Epstein-Barr virus R-gene quantification kit in whole blood with different extraction methods and PCR platforms.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Viral Infection to Malignancy: The Dual Threat of EBV and COVID-19 in Cancer Development.Viruses · 2025Review
- An Isothermal, Multiplex Amplification Assay for Detection and Genotyping of Human Papillomaviruses in Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissues.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2020Article
- The impact of targeting repetitive BamHI-W sequences on the sensitivity and precision of EBV DNA quantification.PloS one · 2017Article
- Comparison of commercial extraction systems and PCR assays for quantification of Epstein-Barr virus DNA load in whole blood.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012Article
- Epstein-Barr virus: general factors, virus-related diseases and measurement of viral load after transplant.Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia · 2011Article
- Measurement of Epstein-Barr virus DNA load using a novel quantification standard containing two EBV DNA targets and SYBR Green I dye.Virology journal · 2010Article
- Using Epstein-Barr viral load assays to diagnose, monitor, and prevent posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2010Review
- Comparative evaluation of a commercially available automated system for extraction of viral DNA from whole blood: application to monitoring of epstein-barr virus and cytomegalovirus load.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2009Article
- Laboratory assays for Epstein-Barr virus-related disease.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable real-time quantitative PCR assays to measure Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA load (EBV) are useful for monitoring EBV-associated diseases. We evaluated a new commercial kit, EBV R-gene Quantification kit (Argene, Varilhes, France) to quantify EBV DNA load in whole blood. Assay performance was assessed with two PCR platforms (LightCycler 2.0 and SmartCycler 2.0) and three commercial DNA extraction methods. The assay was compared with our in-house real-time EBV PCR using samples from the Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics 2006 EBV proficiency program and using 167 whole-blood specimens from individuals with infectious mononucleosis, from transplanted or HIV-infected patients, and from EBV-seropositive healthy carriers. The EBV R-gene assay was sensitive to 500 copies of EBV DNA per milliliter of whole blood with the two PCR platforms and the three extraction methods and was linear across 4 orders of magnitude. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variations were less than 20%. Nine of 10 samples tested with the EBV R-gene were in agreement with the expected qualitative results of the Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics 2006 EBV proficiency program, and 7 of 10 samples were within +/-0.5 log units of the expected quantitative values, with discrepant results mostly observed for low viral load (ie, <1000 copies/ml). In the clinical specimens, the correlation between the R-gene assay and the in-house PCR was high (r=0.92). In conclusion, the EBV R-gene assay accurately assesses the EBV DNA load in whole blood of patients with various forms of EBV infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.