Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18164455›Full record

SynthesisThe spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society

Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with functional restoration.

Robert J Gatchel, Tom G Mayer

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. La Tunisie medicale · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Nuclear magnetic resonance therapy in lumbar disc herniation with lumbar radicular syndrome: effects of the intervention on pain intensity, health-related quality of life, disease-related disability, consumption of pain medication, duration of sick leave and MRI analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2015
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert J GatchelDepartment of Psychology, College of Science, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019-0528, USA. gatchel@uta.edu
Tom G Mayer

Funding

PREVENTING CO-MORBID MENTAL &PHYSICAL HEALTH DISABILITYR01MH046452 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · PI GATCHEL, ROBERT JOSEPH · 1991 to 2007
$2.3M
Comorbidity of Mental Disorders and PainK05MH071892 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ARLINGTON · PI GATCHEL, ROBERT JOSEPH · 2004 to 2008
$1.2M
NIMH NIH HHS 1K05 MH071892NIMH NIH HHS 3R01 MH045462NIMH NIH HHS K05 MH071892NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH046452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of chronic low back pain (CLBP) has proven to be very challenging in North America, as evidenced by its mounting socioeconomic burden. Choosing amongst available nonsurgical therapies can be overwhelming for many stakeholders, including patients, health providers, policy makers, and third-party payers. Although all parties share a common goal and wish to use limited health-care resources to support interventions most likely to result in clinically meaningful improvements, there is often uncertainty about the most appropriate intervention for a particular patient. To help understand and evaluate the various commonly used nonsurgical approaches to CLBP, the North American Spine Society has sponsored this special focus issue of The Spine Journal, titled Evidence-Informed Management of Chronic Low Back Pain Without Surgery. Articles in this special focus issue were contributed by leading spine practitioners and researchers, who were invited to summarize the best available evidence for a particular intervention and encouraged to make this information accessible to nonexperts. Each of the articles contains five sections (description, theory, evidence of efficacy, harms, and summary) with common subheadings to facilitate comparison across the 24 different interventions profiled in this special focus issue, blending narrative and systematic review methodology as deemed appropriate by the authors. It is hoped that articles in this special focus issue will be informative and aid in decision making for the many stakeholders evaluating nonsurgical interventions for CLBP.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicineRecovery of FunctionChronic DiseaseHumansLow Back Pain

Identifiers

PMID18164455
PMCPMC3237293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.