Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18163597›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2008

Elimination of systematic mass measurement errors in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry based proteomics using regression models and a priori partial knowledge of the sample content.

Vladislav A Petyuk, Navdeep Jaitly, Ronald J Moore, Jie Ding, Thomas O Metz, Keqi Tang, Matthew E Monroe, Aleksey V Tolmachev, Joshua N Adkins, Mikhail E Belov and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mass Spectrometry for Proteomics-Based Investigation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bioinformatics Methods for Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Data Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Vladislav A PetyukBiological Sciences Division and Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, USA.
Navdeep Jaitly
Ronald J Moore
Jie Ding
Thomas O Metz
Keqi Tang
Matthew E Monroe
Aleksey V Tolmachev
Joshua N Adkins
Mikhail E Belov
Alan R Dabney
Wei-Jun Qian
David G Camp
Richard D Smith

Funding

WORKSHOP AND TRAINING ACTIVITIESP41RR018522 · NCRR · BATTELLE PACIFIC NORTHWEST LABORATORIES · PI SMITH, RICHARD D · 2003 to 2011
$25.1M
Resolving rate limiting steps for AAV vectorsP01HL066973 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SAMULSKI, RICHARD J · 2001 to 2005
$9.3M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR018522NCRR NIH HHS RR18522NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL066973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high mass measurement accuracy and precision available with recently developed mass spectrometers is increasingly used in proteomics analyses to confidently identify tryptic peptides from complex mixtures of proteins, as well as post-translational modifications and peptides from nonannotated proteins. To take full advantage of high mass measurement accuracy instruments, it is necessary to limit systematic mass measurement errors. It is well known that errors in m/z measurements can be affected by experimental parameters that include, for example, outdated calibration coefficients, ion intensity, and temperature changes during the measurement. Traditionally, these variations have been corrected through the use of internal calibrants (well-characterized standards introduced with the sample being analyzed). In this paper, we describe an alternative approach where the calibration is provided through the use of a priori knowledge of the sample being analyzed. Such an approach has previously been demonstrated based on the dependence of systematic error on m/z alone. To incorporate additional explanatory variables, we employed multidimensional, nonparametric regression models, which were evaluated using several commercially available instruments. The applied approach is shown to remove any noticeable biases from the overall mass measurement errors and decreases the overall standard deviation of the mass measurement error distribution by 1.2-2-fold, depending on instrument type. Subsequent reduction of the random errors based on multiple measurements over consecutive spectra further improves accuracy and results in an overall decrease of the standard deviation by 1.8-3.7-fold. This new procedure will decrease the false discovery rates for peptide identifications using high-accuracy mass measurements.

Indexed as

Regression AnalysisAlgorithmsCalibrationChromatography, LiquidComplex MixturesFalse Positive ReactionsMass SpectrometryModels, BiologicalPeptidesProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTrypsinComplex MixturesPeptidesTrypsin

Identifiers

PMID18163597
PMCPMC2518823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.