Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18162423›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2008

Interactions between glutamate and capsaicin in inducing muscle pain and sensitization in humans.

L Arendt-Nielsen, P Svensson, B J Sessle, B E Cairns, K Wang

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pain (London, England), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Orofacial pain.Pain · 2011
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Sensory testing of the human gastrointestinal tract.World journal of gastroenterology · 2009
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

L Arendt-NielsenCenter for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Orofacial Pain Laboratory, Aalborg University, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark.
P Svensson
B J Sessle
B E Cairns
K Wang
Aalborg University · DKAarhus University · DKUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

ZINC STATUS AND T CELL DISORDER IN MILD HUMAN ZINC DEFICIENCYM01RR001032 · NCRR · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI MANTZOROS, CHRISTOS S · 1985 to 2008
$32.3M
PERIPHERAL NMDA RECEPTORS AND TMD PAIN MECHANISMSR01DE015420 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO · PI SESSLE, BARRY J. · 2003 to 2006
$1.2M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR001032NIDCR NIH HHS 1 R01DE015420-01NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE015420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate the interaction between glutamate and capsaicin in inducing muscle pain and sensitization in humans. Fifteen male volunteers participated. Glutamate or capsaicin or isotonic saline, in a paired-sequence order, was injected randomly into the right or left masseter muscle. Two injections were given in a double-blinded design 25 min apart in 1 session/week over 4 weeks: saline (A1) followed by glutamate (A2), capsaicin (B1) followed by glutamate (B2), saline (C1) followed by capsaicin (C2), and glutamate (D1) followed by capsaicin (D2). The subjects drew the area of perceived pain and scored pain intensity on a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS). Pressure pain threshold (PPT) at the injection site, at a site 2-cm away, and on the contralateral side, as well as pressure pain tolerance (PPTol) at the injection site and contralateral site, were also measured before and after injection and subsequently at 5-min intervals. Paired t-test analyses showed that the pain drawing area was significantly smaller in the B2 compared to the A2 condition (P=0.028), and significantly larger in the D2 compared to the C2 condition (P=0.027). It also revealed significantly lower VAS peak pain intensity (P=0.008) and smaller VAS area under the curve (P=0.003) for the B2 compared to the A2 condition, and significantly higher VAS peak pain (P=0.015) and larger VAS area under the curve (P=0.037) for the D2 compared to the C2 condition. There was a significant PPT and PPTol decrease at the injection site after glutamate or capsaicin injection (ANOVA: P<0.028). The percentage decrease in PPT or PPTol (at the injection site) was not significantly different for the B2 compared to the A2 condition (Paired t-test: P>0.682) or for the D2 compared to the C2 condition (P>0.133). Significant PPT changes were also observed at the site 2 cm away, but not on the contralateral side. In conclusion, these findings indicate that intramuscular administrations of glutamate and capsaicin interact and influence pain and sensitization of muscle nociceptors: glutamate causes a sensitization to subsequent administration of capsaicin, whereas capsaicin is associated with a desensitization to subsequent injection of glutamate. These findings support previous animal data.

Indexed as

AdultCapsaicinDouble-Blind MethodDrug InteractionsFacial PainFemaleGlutamic AcidHumansInjections, IntramuscularMaleMasseter MuscleNeurotoxinsPain MeasurementPain ThresholdPressureCapsaicinGlutamic AcidNeurotoxins

Identifiers

PMID18162423
PMCPMC2491497
OpenAlexW2021940065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.