Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18162090›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2008

Risk factors for rejection and infection in pediatric liver transplantation.

R W Shepherd, Y Turmelle, M Nadler, J A Lowell, M R Narkewicz, S V McDiarmid, R Anand, C Song, SPLIT Research Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Burden of infectious diseases in children during the first year after solid organ transplantation.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

R W ShepherdWashington University School of Medicine and St Louis Children's Hospital, MO, USA. shepherd_r@kids.wustl.edu
Y Turmelle
M Nadler
J A Lowell
M R Narkewicz
S V McDiarmid
R Anand
C Song
SPLIT Research Group
St. Louis Children's Hospital · USEmmes (United States) · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Studies of Pediatric Liver TransplantationU01DK061693 · NIDDK · THE EMMES COMPANY, LLC · PI LINDBLAD, ANNE S · 2004 to 2010
$5.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061693NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK061693-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rejection and infection are important adverse events after pediatric liver transplantation, not previously subject to concurrent risk analysis. Of 2291 children (<18 years), rejection occurred at least once in 46%, serious bacterial/fungal or viral infections in 52%. Infection caused more deaths than rejection (5.5% vs. 0.6% of patients, p < 0.001). Early rejection (<6 month) did not contribute to mortality or graft failure. Recurrent/chronic rejection was a risk in graft failure, but led to retransplant in only 1.6% of first grafts. Multivariate predictors of bacterial/fungal infection included recipient age (highest in infants), race, donor organ variants, bilirubin, anhepatic time, cyclosporin (vs. tacrolimus) and era of transplant (before 2002 vs. after 2002); serious viral infection predictors included donor organ variants, rejection, Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) naivety and era; for rejection, predictors included age (lowest in infants), primary diagnosis, donor-recipient blood type mismatch, the use of cyclosporin (vs. tacrolimus), no induction and era. In pediatric liver transplantation, infection risk far exceeds that of rejection, which causes limited harm to the patient or graft, particularly in infants. Aggressive infection control, attention to modifiable factors such as pretransplant nutrition and donor organ options and rigorous age-specific review of the risk/benefit of choice and intensity of immunosuppressive regimes is warranted.

Indexed as

AdolescentCause of DeathChildGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInfectionsLiver TransplantationPostoperative ComplicationsProbabilityRecurrenceReoperationRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisTreatment FailureImmunosuppressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID18162090
PMCPMC3828123
OpenAlexW2166588973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.