Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18162044›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2007

Indirect effects of ploidy suggest X chromosome dose, not the X:A ratio, signals sex in Drosophila.

James W Erickson, Jerome J Quintero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 123 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
123citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

123 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Bourbon and Mycbp function with Otu to promote Sxl protein expression in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sex matters in preclinical research.Disease models & mechanisms · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. The Roles ofInsects · 2023
    Article
  20. Review

63 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James W EricksonDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, United States of America. jerickson@mail.bio.tamu.edu
Jerome J Quintero

Funding

CHROMOSOME COUNTING MECHANISMS IN SEX DETERMINIATIONR01GM063606 · NIGMS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM · PI ERICKSON, JAMES W · 2001 to 2006
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM063606NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the textbook view, the ratio of X chromosomes to autosome sets, X:A, is the primary signal specifying sexual fate in Drosophila. An alternative idea is that X chromosome number signals sex through the direct actions of several X-encoded signal element (XSE) proteins. In this alternative, the influence of autosome dose on X chromosome counting is largely indirect. Haploids (1X;1A), which possess the male number of X chromosomes but the female X:A of 1.0, and triploid intersexes (XX;AAA), which possess a female dose of two X chromosomes and the ambiguous X:A ratio of 0.67, represent critical tests of these hypotheses. To directly address the effects of ploidy in primary sex determination, we compared the responses of the signal target, the female-specific SxlPe promoter of the switch gene Sex-lethal, in haploid, diploid, and triploid embryos. We found that haploids activate SxlPe because an extra precellular nuclear division elevates total X chromosome numbers and XSE levels beyond those in diploid males. Conversely, triploid embryos cellularize one cycle earlier than diploids, causing premature cessation of SxlPe expression. This prevents XX;AAA embryos from fully engaging the autoregulatory mechanism that maintains subsequent Sxl expression, causing them to develop as sexual mosaics. We conclude that the X:A ratio predicts sexual fate, but does not actively specify it. Instead, the instructive X chromosome signal is more appropriately seen as collective XSE dose in the early embryo. Our findings reiterate that correlations between X:A ratios and cell fates in other organisms need not implicate the value of the ratio as an active signal.

Indexed as

PloidiesSex Determination ProcessesAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianFemaleGene DosageGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMaleModels, BiologicalPhenotypeRNA-Binding ProteinsSex ChromosomesTime FactorsTranscription, GeneticDrosophila ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsSxl protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID18162044
PMCPMC2222971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.