Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18161917›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2007

JAK-STAT pathway in carcinogenesis: is it relevant to cholangiocarcinoma progression?

Olga V Smirnova, Tatiana Yu Ostroukhova, Roman L Bogorad

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Adjuvant Properties of Caffeic Acid in Cancer Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Organogenesis and tumorigenesis: insight from the JAK/STAT pathway in the Drosophila eye.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2010
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Olga V SmirnovaLaboratory of Endocrinology, Biological Faculty, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, 1/12, 119992, Moscow, Russia. smirnova_ov@mail.ru
Tatiana Yu Ostroukhova
Roman L Bogorad
Délégation Paris 5 · FRInserm · FRLomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The features of JAK-STAT signaling in liver cells are discussed in the current review. The role of this signaling cascade in carcinogenesis is accentuated. The possible involvement of this pathway and alteration of its elements are compared for normal cholangiocytes, cholangiocarcinoma predisposition and development. Prolactin and interleukin-6 are described in detail as the best studied examples. In addition, the non-classical nuclear translocation of cytokine receptors is discussed in terms of its possible implication to cholangiocarcinoma development.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticCholangiocarcinomaHumansJanus KinasesSignal TransductionSTAT Transcription FactorsJanus KinasesSTAT Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID18161917
PMCPMC4611286
OpenAlexW2142212422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.