Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18159308›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses2000

Medical decision analysis in infectious diseases.

U D Allen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of infectious diseases = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

U D AllenDivision of Infectious Diseases, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical decision analysis (MDA) has played an important role in assisting infectious disease physicians make decisions associated with varying levels of complexity. Clinicians are often uncomfortable with some aspects of MDA, particularly when utilities are used as outcome measures. However, as the present paper outlines, MDA may use other outcome variables, including costs and disease complications. In this context, this explicit, reproducible analytic framework is an important tool in the area of infectious diseases, and is frequently applied to many situations, including cost effectiveness analyses, studies involving assessment of risks versus benefits of preventive and treatment strategies, and other situations. The objective of this paper is to assist infectious diseases clinicians to understand better the role of MDA in clinical practice. In this regard, the principles of MDA are reviewed and a common clinical example is used for illustrative purposes.

Indexed as

Decision analysisInfectious diseases

Identifiers

PMID18159308
PMCPMC2094783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.