ArticleNucleic acids research2008
MIPS: analysis and annotation of genome information in 2007.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strategies to include prior knowledge in omics analysis with deep neural networks.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Review
- Identification of the HNSC88 Molecular Signature for Predicting Subtypes of Head and Neck Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Convolutional neural network for human cancer types prediction by integrating protein interaction networks and omics data.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Membrane protein-regulated networks across human cancers.Nature communications · 2019Article
- A homologous mapping method for three-dimensional reconstruction of protein networks reveals disease-associated mutations.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
- Transcriptome analysis of smut fungi reveals widespread intergenic transcription and conserved antisense transcript expression.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Systematic analysis of the molecular mechanism underlying atherosclerosis using a text mining approach.Human genomics · 2016Article
- Interlog protein network: an evolutionary benchmark of protein interaction networks for the evaluation of clustering algorithms.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Module organization and variance in protein-protein interaction networks.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Article
- Efficient prediction of progesterone receptor interactome using a support vector machine model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015Article
- Reconstructing genome-wide protein-protein interaction networks using multiple strategies with homologous mapping.PloS one · 2015Article
- Systematic Analysis of the Molecular Mechanism Underlying Decidualization Using a Text Mining Approach.PloS one · 2015Article
- Ustilago maydis natural antisense transcript expression alters mRNA stability and pathogenesis.Molecular microbiology · 2013Article
- H-InvDB in 2013: an omics study platform for human functional gene and transcript discovery.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- Article
- Community of protein complexes impacts disease association.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2012Article
- MoNetFamily: a web server to infer homologous modules and module-module interaction networks in vertebrates.Nucleic acids research · 2012Article
- Accuracy improvement in protein complex prediction from protein interaction networks by refining cluster overlaps.Proteome science · 2012Article
- BnMs3 is required for tapetal differentiation and degradation, microspore separation, and pollen-wall biosynthesis in Brassica napus.Journal of experimental botany · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Munich Information Center for Protein Sequences (MIPS-GSF, Neuherberg, Germany) combines automatic processing of large amounts of sequences with manual annotation of selected model genomes. Due to the massive growth of the available data, the depth of annotation varies widely between independent databases. Also, the criteria for the transfer of information from known to orthologous sequences are diverse. To cope with the task of global in-depth genome annotation has become unfeasible. Therefore, our efforts are dedicated to three levels of annotation: (i) the curation of selected genomes, in particular from fungal and plant taxa (e.g. CYGD, MNCDB, MatDB), (ii) the comprehensive, consistent, automatic annotation employing exhaustive methods for the computation of sequence similarities and sequence-related attributes as well as the classification of individual sequences (SIMAP, PEDANT and FunCat) and (iii) the compilation of manually curated databases for protein interactions based on scrutinized information from the literature to serve as an accepted set of reliable annotated interaction data (MPACT, MPPI, CORUM). All databases and tools described as well as the detailed descriptions of our projects can be accessed through the MIPS web server (http://mips.gsf.de).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.