Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18157724›Full record

Trial reportCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2008

Phase I/II study of treatment with matured dendritic cells with or without low dose IL-2 in patients with disseminated melanoma.

P Hersey, G M Halliday, M L Farrelly, C DeSilva, M Lett, S W Menzies

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Cellular immunotherapy in melanoma: the next frontier in cancer treatment.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Trends in cancer immunotherapy.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2010
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

P HerseyOncology and Immunology Unit, Room 443, David Maddison Clinical Sciences Building, Cnr. King & Watt Streets, Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia. peter.hersey@newcastle.edu.au
G M Halliday
M L Farrelly
C DeSilva
M Lett
S W Menzies
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital · AUMelanoma Institute Australia · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the present study, we have examined whether treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma with matured dendritic cell (DC) vaccines with or without low dose IL-2 may improve treatment outcomes.

methodsSixteen patients received DC vaccines (DCs) sensitized with autologous melanoma lysates and 18 patients received DCs sensitized with peptides from gp100, MART-1, tyrosinase, MAGE-3.A2, MAGE-A10 and NA17. IL-2 was given subcutaneously (sc) at 1 MU/m2 on the second day after each injection for 5-14 days in half of each group. DCs were given by intranodal injection.

resultsThere were 2 partial responses (PR) and 3 with stable disease (SD) in the nine patients receiving DCs + peptides + IL-2, and 1 PR and 1 SD in nine patients treated with DCs + peptides without IL-2. There were only two patients with SD in the group receiving DCs + autologous lysates and no IL-2. Median overall survival for all patients was very good at 18.5 months but this was most probably due to selection of a favourable group of patients for the study. There was no significant difference in survival between the groups by log rank analysis. Treatment was not associated with significant side effects. The quality and yield of the DCs in the preparations were generally good.

conclusionsWe conclude that mature DC preparations may be superior to immature DC preparations for presentation of melanoma peptides and that IL-2 may increase clinical responses to the DCs plus peptides. However, in our view the low response rates do not justify the cost and complexity of this treatment approach.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCancer VaccinesDendritic CellsFemaleHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveInterleukin-2MaleMelanomaMiddle AgedSkin NeoplasmsCancer VaccinesInterleukin-2

Identifiers

PMID18157724
PMCPMC11030839
OpenAlexW1978862343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.