Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18157698›Full record

ReviewReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2008

Acromegaly: re-thinking the cancer risk.

Siobhan Loeper, Shereen Ezzat

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nutrition, GH/IGF-1 signaling, and cancer.Endocrine-related cancer · 2024
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Acromegaly and Colorectal Neoplasm: An Update.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Insulin-Like Growth Factor Pathway and the Thyroid.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Siobhan LoeperDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. sloeper@uhnresearch.ca
Shereen Ezzat
Cancer Institute (WIA) · INUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acromegaly is characterized by sustained elevation of circulating growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), and is clearly associated with increased morbidity and overall mortality mainly due to cardiovascular, metabolic, and respiratory diseases. Although cancer-related mortality varies widely amongst retroperspective studies, it appears to be consistently elevated mainly in patients with uncontrolled disease. We review individual tumor types including neoplasms of the colon, breast, prostate, and thyroid where in vitro, animal studies, and studies in non-acromegalic cancer patients have established a role for the GH/IGF-I axis in tumor progression and possibly initiation. We highlight deficiencies in data in acromegalic patients where the evidence is less convincing. Instead, we explore the hypothesis that acromegaly, independent of hormone secretion, is a disease that heralds genetic and/or epigenetic alterations predisposing to cancer risk elsewhere.

Indexed as

AcromegalyBreast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGrowth HormoneHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor IMaleNeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsGrowth HormoneInsulin-Like Growth Factor I

Identifiers

PMID18157698
OpenAlexW2090178010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.