ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2008
A study of antagonist affinities for the human histamine H2 receptor.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Roles of Cardiovascular HFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Novel selective βFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2017Article
- International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCVIII. Histamine Receptors.Pharmacological reviews · 2015Review
- Histamine modulates γδ-T lymphocyte migration and cytotoxicity, via Gi and Gs protein-coupled signalling pathways.British journal of pharmacology · 2010Article
- Antagonist affinity measurements at the Gi-coupled human histamine H3 receptor expressed in CHO cells.BMC pharmacology · 2008Article
- What systems can and can't do.British journal of pharmacology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeLigand affinity has been a fundamental concept in the field of pharmacology and has traditionally been considered to be constant for a given receptor-ligand interaction. Recent studies have demonstrated that this is not true for all three members of the G(s)-coupled beta-adrenoceptor family. This study evaluated antagonist affinity measurements at a different G(s)-coupled receptor, the histamine H(2) receptor, to determine whether antagonist affinity measurements made at a different family of GPCRs were constant. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: CHO cells stably expressing the human histamine H(2) receptor and a CRE-SPAP reporter were used and antagonist affinity was assessed in short-term cAMP assays and longer term CRE gene transcription assays. KEY
resultsNine agonists and seven antagonists, of sufficient potency at the H(2) receptor to examine in detail, were identified. Measurements of antagonist affinity were the same regardless of the efficacy of the competing agonist, time of agonist incubation, cellular response measured or presence of a PDE inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Antagonist affinity at the G(s)-coupled histamine H(2) receptor obeys the accepted dogma for antagonism at GPCRs. This study further confirms that something unusual is indeed happening with the beta-adrenoceptors and is not an artefact related to the transfected cell system used. As the human histamine H(2) receptor does not behave in a similar manner to any of the human beta-adrenoceptors, it is clear that information gathered from one GPCR cannot be simply extrapolated to predict the behaviour of another GPCR. Each GPCR therefore requires careful and detailed evaluation on its own.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.