Web 3.0 and medicine.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

1. John Shaw Billings: creator of Index Medicus and medical visionary.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2018
   Article
2. Crafting a positive professional digital profile to augment your practice.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2016
   Article
3. Wikis and collaborative writing applications in health care: a scoping review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2013
   Article
4. Design of a Personal Health Record and Health Knowledge Sharing System using IHE-XDS and OWL.Journal of medical systems · 2013
   Article
5. Realizing the promise of Web 2.0: engaging community intelligence.Journal of health communication · 2011
   Article
6. [Concept and applications of the Web 3.0: an introduction for medical doctors].Atencion primaria · 2010
   Article
7. Open Medicine is indexed in PubMed.Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal · 2010
   Article
8. Potential benefits and harms of a peer support social network service on the internet for people with depressive tendencies: qualitative content analysis and social network analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2009
   Article
9. A Web-based graphical user interface for evidence-based decision making for health care allocations in rural areas.International journal of health geographics · 2008
   Article
10. Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: tensions and controversies in the field.Journal of medical Internet research · 2008
    Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as