Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18155758›Full record

SynthesisPreventive medicine2008

Vitamin D and calcium intake in relation to risk of endometrial cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Marjorie L McCullough, Elisa V Bandera, Dirk F Moore, Lawrence H Kushi

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Preventive medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Vitamin D and VDR in Gynecological Cancers-A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Odds ratio analysis in women with endometrial cancer.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2016
    Article
  14. Prospective analysis of vitamin D and endometrial cancer risk.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2013
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marjorie L McCulloughEpidemiology and Surveillance Research, American Cancer Society, 1599 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA. marji.mccullough@cancer.org
Elisa V Bandera
Dirk F Moore
Lawrence H Kushi
American Cancer Society · USCancer Institute of Florida · USKaiser Permanente · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Phytoestrogens, alcohol, and endometrial cancer riskK07CA095666 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI BANDERA, ELISA V · 2003 to 2007
$672k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA095666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn response to a recent ecologic study of UV exposure and endometrial cancer incidence, we present the epidemiologic evidence on the relation between intake of vitamin D and its metabolically related nutrient, calcium, and the occurrence of endometrial cancer.

methodsWe conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of vitamin D and calcium in relation to endometrial cancer, including peer-reviewed manuscripts published up to May 2007. Random and fixed effects summary estimates were computed.

resultsPooled analyses of the three case-control studies of dietary vitamin D and endometrial cancer uncovered heterogeneous results that were not significant in random or fixed effects analyses. Cut-points for the highest vitamin D intakes ranged from >244 to >476 IU/day. Qualitatively similar findings were observed for dietary calcium. Only two studies provided estimates for calcium supplements (random effects OR=0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.99; fixed effects OR=0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.93, for top vs. bottom category, p for heterogeneity=0.25).

conclusionsThe limited epidemiological evidence suggests no relation between endometrial cancer in the ranges of dietary vitamin D examined, and suggests a possible inverse association for calcium from supplements. Prospective studies, ideally including plasma 25(OH) D to estimate vitamin D input from diet and sun exposure, are needed to further explore these hypotheses.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCalcium, DietaryDietary SupplementsEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRisk FactorsVitamin DCalcium, DietaryVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID18155758
PMCPMC2442474
OpenAlexW2092259314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.