Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18154319›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2008

Efficient removal of formamidopyrimidines by 8-oxoguanine glycosylases.

Nirmala Krishnamurthy, Kazuhiro Haraguchi, Marc M Greenberg, Sheila S David

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. 8-Oxoguanine: A Lesion, an Epigenetic Mark, or a Molecular Signal?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dynamic features of human mitochondrial DNA maintenance and transcription.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  13. Synthesis of Oligonucleotides Containing the NChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2020
    Article
  14. The genomics of oxidative DNA damage, repair, and resulting mutagenesis.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nirmala KrishnamurthyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, 315 South, 1400 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.
Kazuhiro Haraguchi
Marc M Greenberg
Sheila S David

Funding

Chemistry and Biology of Oxidized Purine Lesions in DNAR01CA090689 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BURROWS, CYNTHIA J, DAVID, SHEILA SUE · 2002 to 2019
$5.5M
FORMAMIDOPYRIMIDINE LESIONS--NUCLEIC ACID STRUCT/FUNCTR01CA074954 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, MARC M · 1997 to 2006
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA-074954NCI NIH HHS CA-90689NCI NIH HHS R01 CA074954NCI NIH HHS R01 CA090689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under conditions of oxidative stress, the formamidopyrimidine lesions (FapyG and FapyA) are formed in competition with the corresponding 8-oxopurines (OG and OA) from a common intermediate. In order to reveal features of the repair of these lesions, and the potential contribution of repair in mitigating or exacerbating the mutagenic properties of Fapy lesions, their excision by three glycosylases, Fpg, hOGG1 and Ntg1, was examined in various base pair contexts under single-turnover conditions. FapyG was removed at least as efficiently as OG by all three glycosylases. In addition, the rates of removal of FapyG by Fpg and hOGG1 were influenced by their base pair partner, with preference for removal when base paired with the correct Watson-Crick partner C. With the FapyA lesion, Fpg and Ntg1 catalyze its removal more readily than OG opposite all four natural bases. In contrast, the removal of FapyA by hOGG1 was not as robust as FapyG or OG, and was only significant when the lesion was paired with C. The discrimination by the various glycosylases with respect to the opposing base was highly dependent on the identity of the lesion. OG induced the greatest selectivity against its removal when part of a promutagenic base pair. The superb activity of the various OG glycosylases toward removal of FapyG and FapyA in vitro suggests that these enzymes may act upon these oxidized lesions in vivo. The differences in the activity of the various glycosylases for removal of FapyG and FapyA compared to OG in nonmutagenic versus promutagenic base pair contexts may serve to alter the mutagenic profiles of these lesions in vivo.

Indexed as

8-Hydroxy-2'-DeoxyguanosineCatalysisDeoxyadenosinesDeoxyguanosineDNA-(Apurinic or Apyrimidinic Site) LyaseDNA-Formamidopyrimidine GlycosylaseDNA GlycosylasesFormamidesFuransHumansKineticsN-Glycosyl HydrolasesOligodeoxyribonucleotidesPyrimidinesSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins2'-deoxy-7,8-dihydro-8-oxoadenosine8-Hydroxy-2'-DeoxyguanosineDeoxyadenosinesDeoxyguanosineDNA-(Apurinic or Apyrimidinic Site) LyaseDNA-Formamidopyrimidine GlycosylaseDNA GlycosylasesFormamidesFuransN4-(2-deoxypentofuranosyl)-4,6-diamino-5-formamidopyrimidineN6-(2-deoxy-erythro-pentofuranosyl)-2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-formamidopyrimidineN-Glycosyl HydrolasesNTG1 protein, S cerevisiaeOligodeoxyribonucleotidesoxoguanine glycosylase 1, humanPyrimidinesSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18154319
PMCPMC2424258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.