ArticleMicrobial ecology2008
Bacterial population structure of the jute-retting environment.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- A prototype bioreactor for the water retting of hemp bast fiber: dynamics of the liquor bacterial consortium across sequential retting cycles.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Enhancing Biodiversity-Function Relationships in Field Retting: Towards Key Microbial Indicators for Retting Control.Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
- Microbial communities and their role in enhancing hemp fiber quality through field retting.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Comparative metagenomics and microbial dynamics of jute retting environment.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024Article
- Estimating the bias related to DNA recovery from hemp stems for retting microbial community investigation.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Metagenomic and proteomic analysis of bacterial retting community and proteome profile in the degumming process of kenaf bast.BMC plant biology · 2022Article
- Effect of Incorporating Polyvinyl Alcohol Fiber on the Mechanical Properties of EICP-Treated Sand.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The Influence of the Addition of Plant-Based Natural Fibers (Jute) on Biocemented Sand Using MICP Method.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Pectinolytic Bacterial Consortia Reduce Jute Retting Period and Improve Fibre Quality.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Comparison of traditional field retting and Phlebia radiata Cel 26 retting of hemp fibres for fibre-reinforced composites.AMB Express · 2017Article
- Characterization of Bacterial and Fungal Community Dynamics by High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS) Metabarcoding during Flax Dew-Retting.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- Bio-degumming technology of jute bast by Pectobacterium sp. DCE-01.AMB Express · 2016Article
- Bacterial succession and metabolite changes during flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) retting with Bacillus cereus HDYM-02.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Investigation of the bacterial retting community of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus) under different conditions using next-generation semiconductor sequencing.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Jute is one of the most versatile bast fibers obtained through the process of retting, which is a result of decomposition of stalks by the indigenous microflora. However, bacterial communities associated with the retting of jute are not well characterized. To investigate the presence of microorganisms during the process of jute retting, full-cycle rRNA approach was followed, and two 16S rRNA gene libraries, from jute-retting locations of Krishnanagar and Barrackpore, were constructed. Phylotypes affiliating to seven bacterial divisions were identified in both libraries. The bulk of clones came from Proteobacteria ( approximately 37, 41%) and a comparatively smaller proportion of clones from the divisions-Firmicutes ( approximately 11, 12%), Cytophaga-Flexibacter-Bacteroidetes group (CFB; approximately 9, 7%), Verrucomicrobia ( approximately 6, 5%), Acidobacteria ( approximately 4, 5%), Chlorobiales ( approximately 5, 5%), and Actinobacteria ( approximately 4, 2%) were identified. Percent coverage value and diversity estimations of phylotype richness, Shannon-Weiner index, and evenness confirmed the diverse nature of both the libraries. Evaluation of the retting waters by whole cell rRNA-targeted flourescent in situ hybridization, as detected by domain- and group-specific probes, we observed a considerable dominance of the beta-Proteobacteria (25.9%) along with the CFB group (24.4%). In addition, 32 bacterial species were isolated on culture media from the two retting environments and identified by 16S rDNA analysis, confirming the presence of phyla, Proteobacteria ( approximately 47%), Firmicutes ( approximately 22%), CFB group ( approximately 19%), and Actinobacteria ( approximately 13%) in the retting niche. Thus, our study presents the first quantification of the dominant and diverse bacterial phylotypes in the retting ponds, which will further help in improving the retting efficiency, and hence the fiber quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.