Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18097019›Full record

ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2008

Baculovirus-infected insect cells expressing peptide-MHC complexes elicit protective antitumor immunity.

Kimberly R Jordan, Rachel H McMahan, Jason Z Oh, Matthew R Pipeling, Drew M Pardoll, Ross M Kedl, John W Kappler, Jill E Slansky

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Structures suggest an approach for converting weak self-peptide tumor antigens into superagonists for CD8 T cells in cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Peptide vaccines prevent tumor growth by activating T cells that respond to native tumor antigens.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly R JordanUniversity of Colorado Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80206, USA.
Rachel H McMahan
Jason Z Oh
Matthew R Pipeling
Drew M Pardoll
Ross M Kedl
John W Kappler
Jill E Slansky
University of Colorado Denver · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USJohns Hopkins University · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Colorado Health · US

Funding

Mouses Model for Ag.Specific Immunotherapy of CancerR01CA109560 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI SLANSKY, JILL E · 2004 to 2008
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA109560NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluation of T cell responses to tumor- and pathogen-derived peptides in preclinical models is necessary to define the characteristics of efficacious peptide vaccines. We show in this study that vaccination with insect cells infected with baculoviruses expressing MHC class I linked to tumor peptide mimotopes results in expansion of functional peptide-specific CD8+ T cells that protect mice from tumor challenge. Specific peptide mimotopes selected from peptide-MHC libraries encoded by baculoviruses can be tested using this vaccine approach. Unlike other vaccine strategies, this vaccine has the following advantages: peptides that are difficult to solublize can be easily characterized, bona fide peptides without synthesis artifacts are presented, and additional adjuvants are not required to generate peptide-specific responses. Priming of antitumor responses occurs within 3 days of vaccination and is optimal 1 wk after a second injection. After vaccination, the Ag-specific T cell response is similar in animals primed with either soluble or membrane-bound Ag, and CD11c+ dendritic cells increase expression of maturation markers and stimulate proliferation of specific T cells ex vivo. Thus, the mechanism of Ag presentation induced by this vaccine is consistent with cross-priming by dendritic cells. This straightforward approach will facilitate future analyses of T cells elicited by peptide mimotopes.

Indexed as

BaculoviridaeAnimalsCancer VaccinesCD11c AntigenCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCross-PrimingDendritic CellsH-2 AntigensHistocompatibility Antigen H-2DInsectaMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMiceMice, TransgenicNeoplasmsPeptidesVaccinationCancer VaccinesCD11c AntigenH-2 AntigensHistocompatibility Antigen H-2DPeptides

Identifiers

PMID18097019
PMCPMC3111388
OpenAlexW1842886007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.