ArticleSeminars in nuclear medicine2008
Decision support systems in diuresis renography.
Article in Seminars in nuclear medicine, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- 24-h urine collection in patients with urolithiasis: perspective on renal function.Urolithiasis · 2023Observational
- The natural course of incidental ureteral polyp during ureteroscopic surgery: KSER research.BMC urology · 2023Article
- Diagnostic evaluation of pharmacokinetic features of functional markers.Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics · 2023Article
- Principal component analysis of hybrid functional and vector data.Statistics in medicine · 2021Article
- A Bayesian multiple imputation approach to bivariate functional data with missing components.Statistics in medicine · 2021Article
- Assessing alignment between functional markers and ordinal outcomes based on broad sense agreement.Biometrics · 2019Article
- Overall indices for assessing agreement among multiple raters.Statistics in medicine · 2018Article
- Computer-assisted diagnosis in renal nuclear medicine: rationale, methodology, and interpretative criteria for diuretic renography.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2014Review
- Diffusion-weighted MRI of lymphoma: prognostic utility and implications for PET/MRI?European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2013Article
- Computer-aided diagnosis of renal obstruction: utility of log-linear modeling versus standard ROC and kappa analysis.EJNMMI research · 2011Article
- Decision support systems for clinical radiological practice -- towards the next generation.The British journal of radiology · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The volume of diagnostic imaging studies performed in the United States is rapidly increasing resulting from an increase in the number of patients as well as an increase in the volume of studies per patient. Concurrently, the number and complexity of images in each patient data set are also increasing. Nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists are required to master an ever-expanding knowledge base whereas the hours available to master this knowledge base and apply it to specific tasks are steadily shrinking. The convergence of an expanding knowledge base and escalating time constraints increases the likelihood of physician errors. The problem is particularly acute for low-volume studies such as MAG3 diuresis renography where many imagers may have had limited training or experience. To address this problem, renal decision support systems (DSS) are being developed to assist physicians evaluate suspected obstruction in patients referred for diuresis renography. Categories of DSS include neural networks, case-based reasoning, expert systems and statistical systems; RENEX and CART are examples of renal DSS currently in development. RENEX (renal expert) uses a set of rules obtained from human experts to analyze a knowledge base of expanded quantitative parameters obtained from diuresis MAG3 scintigraphy whereas CART (classification and regression tree analysis) is a statistical method that grows and prunes a decision tree based on an analysis of these quantitative parameters in a training data set. RENEX can be queried to provide the reasons for its conclusions. Initial data show that the interpretations provided by RENEX and CART are comparable to the interpretations of a panel of experts blinded to clinical information. This project should serve as a benchmark for the scientific comparison and collaboration of these 2 fields of medical decision-making. Moreover, we anticipate that these DSS will better define the essential interpretative criteria, foster standardized interpretation, teach trainees to better interpret renal scans, enhance diagnostic accuracy and provide a methodology applicable to other diagnostic problems in radiology and medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.