ArticleDrug safety2008
Intelligent risk communication: can it be improved?
Article in Drug safety, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pharmaceutical company perspectives on current safety risk communications in Japan.SpringerPlus · 2014Article
- Focusing on risk communication about medicines: why now?Drug safety · 2012Article
- Public pharmacovigilance communication: a process calling for evidence-based, objective-driven strategies.Drug safety · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Every year, regulators and scientists from academia and industry invest considerable time and effort into drug development, the assessment of safety, and subsequent risk-benefit communication. The observation of everyday medical practice, lay press releases and drug information indicates that all these efforts do not do justice to the work and effort invested. Risk communication is a complex scientific activity, which, when done properly, benefits patients, and when done poorly, may lead to harm. There is much misunderstanding and confusion even between professionals in communicating risk-benefit information, as the association of risk with drug treatment is a difficult concept to accept. It is apparent that the concept of intelligent risk-benefit communication has to be developed extensively on many levels and with the co-operation of everyone involved (patients, physicians, regulators, scientists, journalists, lawyers and the government). This article addresses some key aspects of dealing with the risks associated with drug treatment in everyday practice, as consideration of these risks may be of benefit to all concerned in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.