ArticleMolecular biotechnology2008
A comparison of hybridization efficiency between flat glass and channel glass solid supports.
Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Channel glass-based detection of human short insertion/deletion polymorphisms by tandem hybridization.Molecular biotechnology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Two different solid supports, channel glass and flat glass, were compared for their affect on the sensitivity and efficiency of DNA hybridization reactions. Both solid supports were tested using a set of arrayed, synthetic oligonucleotides that are designed to detect short insertion/deletion polymorphisms (SIDPs). A total of 13 different human SIDPs were chosen for analysis. Capture probes, designed for this test set, were covalently immobilized on substrates. Hybridization efficiency was assessed using fluorescently labeled stacking probes which were preannealed to the target and then hybridized to the support-bound oligonucleotide array; the hybridization pattern was detected by fluorescence imaging. It was found that structural features of nucleic acid capture probes tethered to a solid support and the molecular basis of their interaction with targets in solution have direct implications on the hybridization process. Our results demonstrate that channel glass has a number of practical advantages over flat glass including higher sensitivity and a faster hybridization rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.