Computerized clinical decision support: will it transform healthcare?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Computerized clinical decision support systems for primary preventive care: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes.Implementation science : IS · 2011
   Pooled it
2. Usability evaluation of paper-based "Hajji" Health Record format.Journal of medical systems · 2012
   Article
3. Improving population care with an integrated electronic panel support tool.Population health management · 2011
   Article
4. Information management to enable personalized medicine: stakeholder roles in building clinical decision support.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2009
   Article
5. Barriers to implementation of a computerized decision support system for depression: an observational report on lessons learned in "real world" clinical settings.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2009
   Article
6. Taking PROs and patient-centered care seriously: incremental and disruptive ideas for incorporating PROs in oncology practice.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2008
   Article
7. Health information technology: fallacies and sober realities.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Improving sedative-hypnotic prescribing in older hospitalized patients: provider-perceived benefits and barriers of a computer-based reminder.2008
• Comment on
  Performance of a web-based clinical diagnosis support system for internists.2008

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as