Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18094924›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2007

An integrated physiological and genetic approach to the dynamics of FtsZ targeting and organisation in a moss, Physcomitrella patens.

I Suppanz, E Sarnighausen, R Reski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

I SuppanzPlant Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Federal Republic of Germany.
E Sarnighausen
R Reski

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant FtsZ (filamentous temperature-sensitive Z) proteins are regarded as descendants of prokaryotic cell division proteins. We could show previously that four FtsZ isoforms of the moss Physcomitrella patens assemble into, and interact in, distinct structures inside the chloroplasts and in the cytosol. Their organisation and localisation patterns indicate an involvement in chloroplast and cell division and in the maintenance of chloroplast shape and integrity. The cellular processes of chloroplast division and maintenance of chloroplast shape were disturbed either by application of the beta-lactam antibiotic ampicillin or by a mutation that presumably affects signal transduction of the plant hormone cytokinin. When cells of these plants were analysed microscopically, there was no indication that cytosolic functions of FtsZ proteins were affected. Furthermore, FtsZ proteins continued to build three-dimensional plastoskeleton networks, even in considerably enlarged or malformed chloroplasts. On the other hand, macrochloroplast formation promoted the localisation of FtsZ proteins in filaments that emanate from the plastids and, therefore, most likely represent stromules. Annular FtsZ structures that are regarded as essential components of the division apparatus were absent from macrochloroplasts of ampicillin-treated cells. Thus, the distribution of FtsZ proteins after inhibition of chloroplast division further strengthens our hypothesis on the functions of distinct isoforms. In addition, the results provide further insight into the regulation of protein targeting and dynamics of plastoskeletal elements.

Indexed as

AmpicillinArabidopsis ProteinsBryopsidaMutationPlant ProteinsPlastidsProtein IsoformsProtein TransportProtoplastsRegenerationAmpicillinArabidopsis ProteinsFTSZ protein, ArabidopsisPlant ProteinsProtein Isoforms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.