Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18094115›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2008

Differentiation of C2D macrophage cells after adoptive transfer.

Betsey E Potts, Marcia L Hart, Laura L Snyder, Dan Boyle, Derek A Mosier, Stephen K Chapes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of in vitro macrophage differentiation during space flight.Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Interactive changes between macrophages and adipocytes.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2010
    Article
  10. Macrophage cell lines use CD81 in cell growth regulation.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Betsey E PottsDivision of Biology, Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.
Marcia L Hart
Laura L Snyder
Dan Boyle
Derek A Mosier
Stephen K Chapes

Funding

UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF SMALL RNAS IN ARABIDOPSIS POLLEN DEVELOPMENTP20RR016475 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ACKLEY, BRIAN DOUGLAS · 2001 to 2011
$38.1M
TRANSEPITHELIAL ION TRANSPORT &ITS REGULATIONP20RR017686 · NCRR · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MELGAREJO GARCIA, LUIS TONATIUH · 2002 to 2011
$21.8M
Cellular Immunity Against Ehrlichia chaffeensisR01AI055052 · NIAID · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GANTA, ROMAN R. · 2003 to 2007
$1.5M
Analysis of CD81-PGRL complex on T cellsR01AI052206 · NIAID · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAPES, STEPHEN KEITH · 2003 to 2007
$1.3M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016475NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR017686NCRR NIH HHS RR16475NCRR NIH HHS RR17686NIAID NIH HHS AI052206NIAID NIH HHS AI55052NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI052206NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI055052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C2D macrophage cells protect immunocompromised mice from experimentally induced pneumonias after intraperitoneal (i.p.) adoptive transfer. These macrophage cells are immature and display minimal activity in vitro. Therefore, we wanted to understand how adoptive transfer affected these cells. We believe that the in vivo environment affects the phenotypic and functional characteristics of macrophages that help maintain the physiological integrity of the host. To test this hypothesis, we characterized the trafficking patterns and cellular changes of the established macrophage C2D cell line after adoptive transfer. We examined phenotypic changes of the C2D macrophage cells in vivo with and without stimulation with gamma interferon (IFN-gamma). After in vivo i.p. adoptive transfer, C2D macrophage cells trafficked to the lungs, spleen, lymph nodes, and bone marrow of recipient mice. The cells were detected for as long as 2 months, and the cells expressed increased levels of CD11b, c-fms, and F4/80 on their surface, becoming more differentiated macrophages compared to cells maintained in vitro. Upon in vivo stimulation with IFN-gamma, c-fms levels decreased while Gr-1 levels increased compared to in vivo, unstimulated, phosphate-buffered saline-injected controls. These responses were independent of the genetic backgrounds of the recipient mice. These data support the hypothesis and indicate that C2D macrophage cells respond to in vivo signals that are absent during in vitro culture.

Indexed as

Adoptive TransferAnimalsAntigens, DifferentiationBone Marrow CellsCD11b AntigenCD2 AntigensCell LineCell MembraneInterferon-gammaLungLymph NodesMacrophagesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReceptor, Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorReceptors, ChemokineAntigens, DifferentiationCD11b AntigenCD2 AntigensGr-1 protein, mouseInterferon-gammamonocyte-macrophage differentiation antigenReceptor, Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorReceptors, Chemokine

Identifiers

PMID18094115
PMCPMC2238063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.