ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)2008
Continuity conditions and torsion angles from ssNMR orientational restraints.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997), 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The backbone torsion angle pair (varphi,psi) at each amino acid of a polypeptide is a descriptor of its conformation. One can use chemical shift and dipolar coupling data from solid-state NMR PISEMA experiments to directly calculate the torsion angles for the membrane-spanning portion of a protein. However, degeneracies inherent in the data give rise to multiple potential torsion angles between two adjacent peptide planes (a diplane). The molecular backbone structure can be determined by gluing together the consecutive diplanes, as in the PIPATH algorithm [T. Asbury, J.R. Quine, S. Achuthan, J. Hu, M.S. Chapman, T.A. Cross, R. Bertram, PIPATH: an optimized alogrithm for generating alpha-helical structures from PISEMA data, J. Magn. Reson. 183 (2006) 87-95.]. The multiplicities in torsion angles translate to multiplicities in diplane orientations. In this paper, we show that adjacent diplanes can be glued together to form a permissible structure only if they satisfy continuity conditions, described quantitatively here. These restrict the number of potential torsion angle pairs. We rewrite the torsion angle formulas from [J.R. Quine, M.T. Brenneman, T.A. Cross, Protein structural analysis from solid-state NMR-drived orientational constraints, Biophys. J. 72 (1997) 2342-2348.] so that they automatically satisfy the continuity conditions. The reformulated torsion angle formulas have been applied recently in the PIPATH algorithm [T. Asbury, J.R. Quine, S. Achuthan, J. Hu, M.S. Chapman, T.A. Cross, R. Bertram, PIPATH: an optimized alogrithm for generating alpha-helical structures from PISEMA data, J. Magn. Reson. 183 (2006) 87-95.] and will be helpful in other applications in which diplane gluing is used to construct a protein backbone model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.