Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18091292›Full record

Trial reportNursing research

Cytokine comparisons between women with breast cancer and women with a negative breast biopsy.

Debra E Lyon, Nancy L McCain, Jeanne Walter, Christine Schubert

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Debra E LyonVirginia Commonwealth University School of Nursing, PO Box 980567, 1100 East Leigh St., Richmond, VA 23219-0567, USA. delyon@vcu.edu
Nancy L McCain
Jeanne Walter
Christine Schubert
University of Richmond · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Physical Health, Depressive Symptoms, Happiness, and Maternal CompetenceP20NR008988 · NINR · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MCCAIN, NANCY L · 2004 to 2008
$1.5M
Cranial Stimulation for Chemo Symptoms in Breast CancerR21CA106149 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI LYON, DEBRA E · 2003 to 2004
$453k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA106149NINR NIH HHS P20 NR008988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the biological milieu associated with disease states has important implications for biobehavioral research. Cytokines, signaling molecules that mediate and regulate immunity, inflammation, and hematopoiesis, are an important component of the biological milieu associated with breast cancer. Cytokines have been used as biomarkers in research for prognosis and have been associated with symptoms and adverse outcomes in multiple conditions, including breast cancer. To date, however, the examination of cytokine patterns has been limited by traditional laboratory methods. Advances in proteomic technology now permit the characterization of a broader array of cytokines in a single specimen. Because cytokines operate in integrated networks, a more complete understanding will be gained as multiple cytokines can be examined for patterns of response that may be associated with symptoms and prognosis.

objectivesTo use proteomic technology (a) to examine whether there was a difference in cytokine levels and patterns in women with breast cancer compared with controls, (b) to define and compare the receiver operator characteristic curves for standard cytokine classifications, and (c) to identify the best-fitting empirical model of cytokines to distinguish groups of women found to have breast cancer from those with negative biopsies.

methodsThe cytokine levels of 35 women who had been diagnosed recently with breast cancer were compared with 24 women with a suspicious breast mass who were found subsequently to have a negative breast biopsy. Multiplex bead array assays permitted the simultaneous measure of multiple markers in a small volume of serum. Nonparametric procedures were used to determine differences in the median values and the distributions for each cytokine. The receiver operator characteristic curves were defined to identify patterns of cytokines.

resultsThere were significantly higher systemic cytokine values in women with cancer in comparison with those in women without cancer for all cytokines measured, with the exception of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and interferon-gamma. The only significant associations found between cytokines and age or race were increased levels of interleukin-8 (r = .53) and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 beta (r = .45) with increased age in women with a negative biopsy. Three cytokines (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, interleukin-6, and interleukin-17) distinguished between the breast cancer and no-cancer groups with an exceptionally high areas under the curve (0.981; SE = 0.017). DISCUSSION: Levels of cytokines and their patterns were markedly different in women with breast cancer as compared with those in women who did not have breast cancer. Results from this study highlight the need for further research to examine the levels and patterns of cytokines that may serve as biomarkers in clinical research. Innovations in proteomic technology have implications for expanding biobehavioral research.

Indexed as

AdultArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCytokinesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorCytokines

Identifiers

PMID18091292
PMCPMC2234268
OpenAlexW2020857952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.