Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18088428›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2007

Diversity in conserved genes in tomato.

Allen Van Deynze, Kevin Stoffel, C Robin Buell, Alexander Kozik, Jia Liu, Esther van der Knaap, David Francis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. In silico identification and experimental validation of insertion-deletion polymorphisms in tomato genome.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Phenotypic diversity and association mapping for fruit quality traits in cultivated tomato and related species.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Allen Van DeynzeSeed Biotechnology Center, University of California, 1 Shields Ave,, Davis, CA, USA. avandeynze@ucdavis.edu
Kevin Stoffel
C Robin Buell
Alexander Kozik
Jia Liu
Esther van der Knaap
David Francis
University of California, Davis · USThe Ohio State University · USDepartment of Plant Biology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTomato has excellent genetic and genomic resources including a broad set of Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) data and high-density genetic maps. In addition, emerging physical maps and bacterial artificial clone sequence data serve as template to investigate genetic variation within the cultivated germplasm pool with the goal to manipulate agriculturally important traits. Unfortunately, the nearly exclusive focus of resource development on interspecific populations for genetic analyses and diversity studies has left a void in our understanding of genotypic variation within tomato breeding programs that focus on intra-specific populations. We describe the results of a study to identify nucleotide variation within tomato breeding germplasm and mapping parents for a set of conserved single-copy ESTs that are orthologous between tomato and Arabidopsis.

resultsUsing a pooled sequencing strategy, 967 tomato transcripts were screened for polymorphism in 12 tomato lines. Although intron position was conserved, intron lengths were 2-fold larger in tomato than in Arabidopsis. A total of 1,487 single nucleotide polymorphisms and 282 insertion/deletions were identified, of which 579 and 206 were polymorphic in breeding germplasm, respectively. Fresh market and processing germplasm were clearly divergent, as were Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiformae and Solanum pimpinellifolium, tomato's closest relatives. The polymorphisms identified serve as marker resources for tomato. The COS is also applicable to other Solanaceae crops.

conclusionsThe results from this research enabled significant progress towards bridging the gap between genetic and genomic resources developed for populations derived from wide crosses and those applicable to intra-specific crosses for breeding in tomato.

Indexed as

Base SequenceConserved SequenceDatabases, Nucleic AcidGenes, PlantGenetic VariationIntronsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNASolanum lycopersicum

Identifiers

PMID18088428
PMCPMC2249608
OpenAlexW2121422735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.