ReviewRadiation and environmental biophysics2008
Systems biology and its potential role in radiobiology.
Review in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiomic and radiogenomic modeling for radiotherapy: strategies, pitfalls, and challenges.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Review
- Big Data Analytics for Prostate Radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2016Review
- Dynamics of cellular responses to radiation.PLoS computational biology · 2014Article
- Mutation induction by inhaled radon progeny modeled at the tissue level.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2011Article
- Time-series clustering of gene expression in irradiated and bystander fibroblasts: an application of FBPA clustering.BMC genomics · 2011Article
- Use of proteomics in radiobiological research: current state of the art.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2010Review
- Immunological mechanism of the low-dose radiation-induced suppression of cancer metastases in a mouse model.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society · 2009Article
- The first international workshop on systems radiation biology: a new approach to solve old questions.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
About a century ago, Conrad Röentgen discovered X-rays, and Henri Becquerel discovered a new phenomenon, which Marie and Pierre Curie later coined as radio-activity. Since their seminal work, we have learned much about the physical properties of radiation and its effects on living matter. Alas, the more we discover, the more we appreciate the complexity of the biological processes that are triggered by radiation exposure and eventually lead (or do not lead) to disease. Equipped with modern biological methods of high-throughput experimentation, imaging, and vastly increased computational prowess, we are now entering an era where we can piece some of the multifold aspects of radiation exposure and its sequelae together, and develop a more systemic understanding of radiogenic effects such as radio-carcinogenesis than has been possible in the past. It is evident from the complexity of even the known processes that such an understanding can only be gained if it is supported by mathematical models. At this point, the construction of comprehensive models is hampered both by technical inadequacies and a paucity of appropriate data. Nonetheless, some initial steps have been taken already and the generally increased interest in systems biology may be expected to speed up future progress. In this context, we discuss in this article examples of relatively small, yet very useful models that elucidate selected aspects of the effects of exposure to ionizing radiation and may shine a light on the path before us.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.