Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18085829›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2007

Genome-wide analysis of Rad52 foci reveals diverse mechanisms impacting recombination.

David Alvaro, Michael Lisby, Rodney Rothstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David AlvaroDepartment of Genetics and Development, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Michael Lisby
Rodney Rothstein

Funding

Mechanism of spontaneous and DSB-induced repairR37GM050237 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ROTHSTEIN, RODNEY J. · 2005 to 2014
$6.0M
MECHANISM OF SPONTANEOUS AND DSB-INDUCED REPAIRR01GM050237 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI ROTHSTEIN, RODNEY J. · 1993 to 2016
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM50237NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM050237NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM050237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the DNA damage response, we undertook a genome-wide study in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and identified 86 gene deletions that lead to increased levels of spontaneous Rad52 foci in proliferating diploid cells. More than half of the genes are conserved across species ranging from yeast to humans. Along with genes involved in DNA replication, repair, and chromatin remodeling, we found 22 previously uncharacterized open reading frames. Analysis of recombination rates and synthetic genetic interactions with rad52Delta suggests that multiple mechanisms are responsible for elevated levels of spontaneous Rad52 foci, including increased production of recombinogenic lesions, sister chromatid recombination defects, and improper focus assembly/disassembly. Our cell biological approach demonstrates the diversity of processes that converge on homologous recombination, protect against spontaneous DNA damage, and facilitate efficient repair.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticBase SequenceConserved SequenceDNA DamageDNA, FungalDNA PrimersDNA RepairEpistasis, GeneticEvolution, MolecularGene DeletionGenome, FungalGenomic LibraryLoss of HeterozygosityMitosisModels, GeneticMutationDNA, FungalDNA PrimersRad52 DNA Repair and Recombination ProteinRAD52 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18085829
PMCPMC2134942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.