Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18085819›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2007

Animal cell differentiation patterns suppress somatic evolution.

John W Pepper, Kathleen Sprouffske, Carlo C Maley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. DNA methylation in invertebrate genomes and cell lineage plasticity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. mBio · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cancer and intercellular cooperation.Royal Society open science · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cancer across the tree of life: cooperation and cheating in multicellularity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cancer in light of experimental evolution.Current biology : CB · 2012
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John W PepperDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America. jpepper1@email.arizona
Kathleen Sprouffske
Carlo C Maley

Funding

EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF BARRETT'S ESOPHAGUS NEOPLASIAK01CA089267 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI MALEY, CARLO C · 2001 to 2005
$649k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA089267NCI NIH HHS K01 CA89267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell differentiation in multicellular organisms has the obvious function during development of creating new cell types. However, in long-lived organisms with extensive cell turnover, cell differentiation often continues after new cell types are no longer needed or produced. Here, we address the question of why this is true. It is believed that multicellular organisms could not have arisen or been evolutionarily stable without possessing mechanisms to suppress somatic selection among cells within organisms, which would otherwise disrupt organismal integrity. Here, we propose that one such mechanism is a specific pattern of ongoing cell differentiation commonly found in metazoans with cell turnover, which we call "serial differentiation." This pattern involves a sequence of differentiation stages, starting with self-renewing somatic stem cells and proceeding through several (non-self-renewing) transient amplifying cell stages before ending with terminally differentiated cells. To test the hypothesis that serial differentiation can suppress somatic evolution, we used an agent-based computer simulation of cell population dynamics and evolution within tissues. The results indicate that, relative to other, simpler patterns, tissues organized into serial differentiation experience lower rates of detrimental cell-level evolution. Self-renewing cell populations are susceptible to somatic evolution, while those that are not self-renewing are not. We find that a mutation disrupting differentiation can create a new self-renewing cell population that is vulnerable to somatic evolution. These results are relevant not only to understanding the evolutionary origins of multicellularity, but also the causes of pathologies such as cancer and senescence in extant metazoans, including humans.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionCell ProliferationModels, BiologicalCell CommunicationCell DifferentiationCell DivisionCell SizeCell SurvivalComputer Simulation

Identifiers

PMID18085819
PMCPMC2134960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.