Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18083526›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2008

Impact of proline and aspartic acid residues on the dissociation of intermolecularly crosslinked peptides.

Myles W Gardner, Jennifer S Brodbelt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Development of Large-scale Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2018
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Collision-induced dissociation of Lys-Lys intramolecular crosslinked peptides.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Myles W GardnerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.
Jennifer S Brodbelt
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dissociation of intermolecularly crosslinked peptides was evaluated for a series of peptides with proline or aspartic acid residues positioned adjacent to the crosslinking sites (lysine residues). The peptides were crosslinked with either disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) or disuccinimidyl L-tartrate (DST), and the influence of proline and aspartic acid residues on the fragmentation patterns were investigated for precursor ions with and without a mobile proton. Collisionally activated dissociation (CAD) spectra of aspartic acid-containing crosslinked peptide ions, doubly-charged with both protons sequestered, were dominated by cleavage C-terminal to the Asp residue, similar to that of unmodified peptides. The proline-containing crosslinked peptides exhibited a high degree of internal ion formation, with the resulting product ions having an N-terminal proline residue. Upon dissociation of the doubly-charged crosslinked peptides, twenty to fifty percent of the fragment ion abundance was accounted for by multiple cleavage products. Crosslinked peptides possessing a mobile proton yielded almost a full series of b- and y-type fragment ions, with only proline-directed fragments still observed at high abundances. Interestingly, the crosslinked peptides exhibited a tendency to dissociate at the amide bond C-terminal to the crosslinked lysine residue, relative to the N-terminal side. One could envision updating computer algorithms to include these crosslinker specific product ions--particularly for precursor ions with localized protons--that provide complementary and confirmatory information, to offer more confident identification of both the crosslinked peptides and the location of the crosslink, as well as affording predictive guidelines for interpretation of the product-ion spectra of crosslinked peptides.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAspartic AcidCross-Linking ReagentsIonsLysinePeptidesProlineProtonsSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationSuccinimidesAspartic AcidCross-Linking Reagentsdisuccinimidyl suberatedisuccinimidyl tartarateIonsLysinePeptidesProlineProtonsSuccinimides

Identifiers

PMID18083526
OpenAlexW2003495641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.