Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18081999›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2008

Applying the small-area estimation method to estimate a population eligible for breast cancer detection services.

Kirsten Knutson, Weihong Zhang, Farzaneh Tabnak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Addressing the Challenges of Research With Small Populations.American journal of public health · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Small area estimates reveal high cigarette smoking prevalence in low-income cities of Los Angeles county.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kirsten KnutsonCalifornia Department of Public Health, CDIC/Cancer Detection Section, MS 7203, PO Box 997413, Sacramento, CA 95899-7413, USA. Kirsten.Knutson@cdph.ca.gov
Weihong Zhang
Farzaneh Tabnak

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPopulations eligible for public health programs are often narrowly defined and, therefore, difficult to describe quantitatively, particularly at the local level, because of lack of data. This information, however, is vital for program planning and evaluation. We demonstrate the application of a statistical method using multiple sources of data to generate county estimates of women eligible for free breast cancer screening and diagnostic services through California's Cancer Detection Programs: Every Woman Counts.

methodsWe used the small-area estimation method to determine the proportion of eligible women by county and racial/ethnic group. To do so, we included individual and community data in a generalized, linear, mixed-effect model.

resultsOur method yielded widely varied estimated proportions of service-eligible women at the county level. In all counties, the estimated proportion of eligible women was higher for Hispanics than for whites, blacks, Asian/Pacific Islanders, or American Indian/Alaska Natives. Across counties, the estimated proportions of eligible Hispanic women varied more than did those of women of other races.

conclusionThe small-area estimation method is a powerful tool for approximating narrowly defined eligible or target populations that are not represented fully in any one data source. The variability and reliability of the estimates are measurable and meaningful. Public health programs can use this method to estimate the size of local populations eligible for, or in need of, preventive health services and interventions.

Indexed as

Small-Area AnalysisAdultBreast NeoplasmsCaliforniaEthnicityFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMonte Carlo MethodNeeds AssessmentPreventive Health ServicesPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID18081999
PMCPMC2248789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.