ArticlePLoS genetics2007
Genome organization and gene expression shape the transposable element distribution in the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatin.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Migrators within migrators: exploring transposable element dynamics in the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus.Mobile DNA · 2022Article
- Review
- Interpopulation differences of retroduplication variations (RDVs) in rice retrogenes and their phenotypic correlations.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- A genetic linkage map for the salmon louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis): evidence for high male:female and inter-familial recombination rate differences.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2019Article
- Patterns of transposable element variation and clinality in Drosophila.Molecular ecology · 2019Article
- Parallel evolution of Batesian mimicry supergene in twoScience advances · 2018Article
- Article
- The Genomic Impact of Gene Retrocopies: What Have We Learned from Comparative Genomics, Population Genomics, and Transcriptomic Analyses?Genome biology and evolution · 2017Article
- Regulatory activities of transposable elements: from conflicts to benefits.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2017Review
- Accumulation of transposable elements in Hox gene clusters during adaptive radiation of Anolis lizards.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2016Article
- Correlated expression of retrocopies and parental genes in zebrafish.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2016Article
- Article
- Inter-population Differences in Retrogene Loss and Expression in Humans.PLoS genetics · 2015Article
- Transposable element dynamics and PIWI regulation impacts lncRNA and gene expression diversity in Drosophila ovarian cell cultures.Genome research · 2014Article
- Understanding the regulatory and transcriptional complexity of the genome through structure.Genome research · 2013Review
- "Orphan" retrogenes in the human genome.Molecular biology and evolution · 2013Article
- Comparison of class 2 transposable elements at superfamily resolution reveals conserved and distinct features in cereal grass genomes.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Genomic dynamics of transposable elements in the western clawed frog (Silurana tropicalis).Genome biology and evolution · 2013Article
- The ant genomes have been invaded by several types of mariner transposable elements.Die Naturwissenschaften · 2012Article
- Dynamics and innovations within oomycete genomes: insights into biology, pathology, and evolution.Eukaryotic cell · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The distribution of transposable elements (TEs) in a genome reflects a balance between insertion rate and selection against new insertions. Understanding the distribution of TEs therefore provides insights into the forces shaping the organization of genomes. Past research has shown that TEs tend to accumulate in genomic regions with low gene density and low recombination rate. However, little is known about the factors modulating insertion rates across the genome and their evolutionary significance. One candidate factor is gene expression, which has been suggested to increase local insertion rate by rendering DNA more accessible. We test this hypothesis by comparing the TE density around germline- and soma-expressed genes in the euchromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. Because only insertions that occur in the germline are transmitted to the next generation, we predicted a higher density of TEs around germline-expressed genes than soma-expressed genes. We show that the rate of TE insertions is greater near germline- than soma-expressed genes. However, this effect is partly offset by stronger selection for genome compactness (against excess noncoding DNA) on germline-expressed genes. We also demonstrate that the local genome organization in clusters of coexpressed genes plays a fundamental role in the genomic distribution of TEs. Our analysis shows that-in addition to recombination rate-the distribution of TEs is shaped by the interaction of gene expression and genome organization. The important role of selection for compactness sheds a new light on the role of TEs in genome evolution. Instead of making genomes grow passively, TEs are controlled by the forces shaping genome compactness, most likely linked to the efficiency of gene expression or its complexity and possibly their interaction with mechanisms of TE silencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.