Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18081358›Full record

Trial reportClinical drug investigation2008

Prevention of propofol-induced injection pain by sufentanil: a placebo-controlled comparison with remifentanil.

Azim Honarmand, Mohammadreza Safavi

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Azim HonarmandDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammadreza Safavi
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivePropofol produces anaesthesia with rapid recovery but also causes pain or discomfort on injection. The effect of remifentanil in prevention of propofol-induced injection pain has been demonstrated in earlier studies. However, sufentanil, an opioid analgesic, has not been evaluated as an agent for managing pain on injection of propofol. In this study we aimed to compare the efficacy of remifentanil and sufentanil for the prevention of propofol-induced pain.

methodsThis double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study was carried out from July 2006 to February 2007, and included patients who were candidates for elective surgery in a university hospital. From 92 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I-II adult patients, 80 were randomly assigned to four groups of 20 each. Patients received 2 mL of sufentanil 0.01 mg, 2 mL of remifentanil 0.01 mg, 2 mL of remifentanil 0.02 mg, or 2 mL of saline 60 seconds prior to administration of 5 mL of propofol 1%. Patients were asked prior to losing consciousness whether they felt any pain due to propofol injection, and their pain scores were evaluated on the four-point scale of Ambesh et al.

resultsThe incidence of pain was significantly lower in the remifentanil 0.02-mg group, remifentanil 0.01-mg group and sufentanil group compared with the saline group (40%, 70%, 75% and 100%, respectively, p < 0.05). Median pain intensity scores were significantly lower in the group receiving remifentanil 0.02 mg than in the sufentanil group (0 and 1 respectively, p < 0.05). The median intensity of propofol-induced pain was statistically similar between the groups receiving sufentanil or remifentanil 0.01 mg and the placebo group (1, 1 and 1, respectively, p > 0.05).

conclusionRemifentanil 0.02 mg administered over 60 seconds before propofol administration is more effective than sufentanil 0.01 mg, remifentanil 0.01 mg or placebo administered 1 minute prior to propofol in reducing the incidence and intensity of injection pain.

Indexed as

AdultAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, IntravenousDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodHumansHypotensionInjections, IntravenousMiddle AgedPainPain MeasurementPiperidinesPlacebosPropofolRemifentanilSufentanilAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, IntravenousPiperidinesPlacebosPropofolRemifentanilSufentanil

Identifiers

PMID18081358
OpenAlexW1967167799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.