Trial reportDigestive diseases and sciences2008
Interferon beta 1a versus interferon beta 1a plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Chinese patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drug Repurposing for Japanese Encephalitis Virus Infection by Systems Biology Methods.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Natural interferon-beta treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C in Japan.World journal of hepatology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, the effects of current therapies are limited. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the interferon beta-1a (IFN beta-1a) versus IFN beta-1a plus ribavirin (RBV) combination on Chinese treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C, a randomized, placebo-controlled study was performed. A total of 26 naïve patients histologically confirmed to have chronic hepatitis C were double-blindly and randomly assigned to receive either IFN beta-1a 44 microg (12 MIU) (IFN beta-1a group) or placebo (placebo group) three times per week for 12 weeks. At the end of the 12 weeks of treatment, the patients who received IFN beta-1a continued to complete 24 weeks of treatment. Placebo non-responders were crossed over to IFN beta-1a plus RBV (1,000-1,200 mg/day) combination therapy (IFN beta-1a plus RBV group) for 24 weeks after 4 weeks washout. All patients were followed up for 24 weeks after the end of treatment. Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as the absence of detectable HCV RNA in the serum both at the end of 24 weeks of treatment and at the end of 24 weeks of untreated follow-up. There were no differences in the clinical background between the groups before the initiation of treatment. At the end of the 12 weeks of double-blind therapy, HCV RNA was negative and undetectable in 10/11 patients (90.9%) in the IFN beta-1a group and none in the placebo group. The virological response rate (14/15, 93.3%) of the IFN beta-1a plus RBV group at week 12 after the initiation of therapy was similar to that of the IFN beta-1a group. SVR was observed in 5/11 (45.5%) of the IFN beta-1a group and 11/15 (73.3%) of the IFN beta-1a plus RBV group (P = 0.23). At the end of follow-up, a biochemical response was found in 5/11 patients in the IFN beta-1a group (45.5%) and 8/15 patients in the IFN beta-1a plus RBV group (53.3%, P = 1.00). Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed that an HCV RNA load lower than 1.0x10(6) copies/ml was independently associated with SVR (OR 11.00; 95% CI 1.81-66.97; P = 0.003). The side effects were mild and similar in the two therapy groups. We conclude that IFN beta-1a alone or in combination with RBV provided considerable benefit in Chinese naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C. Treatments with IFN beta-1a alone or IFN beta-1a plus RBV are safe and well tolerated, and may represent an alternative for chronic hepatitis C patients who are unable to tolerate pegylated interferon alpha.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.