Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18080711›Full record

ReviewLung2008

The cough reflex in animals: relevance to human cough research.

Brendan J Canning

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lung, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Sulfolipid-1 fromJournal of neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evidence for AlphaThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Evolution of lung breathing from a lungless primitive vertebrate.Respiratory physiology & neurobiology · 2016
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Perspective on the human cough reflex.Cough (London, England) · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Brendan J CanningJohns Hopkins Asthma and Allergy Center, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. bjc@jhmi.edu

Funding

Reflexes and Supraesophageal Consequences Reflux DiseaseR01HL083192 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CANNING, BRENDAN J · 2006 to 2010
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL083192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All mammalian species studied cough or display some similar respiratory reflex upon aerosol challenge with tussigenic stimuli such as citric acid or capsaicin. Animals cough to the same stimuli that evoke coughing in humans, and therapeutic agents that display antitussive effects in human studies also prevent coughing in animals. The many invasive procedures and complementary in vitro studies possible in animals but not readily reproduced in human subjects, along with the proven predictive value of cough studies in animals, provide the rationale for animal modeling of human cough. The advantages and disadvantages of studying cough in animals are discussed.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBiomedical ResearchCoughExhalationHumansInhalation ExposureReflex

Identifiers

PMID18080711
PMCPMC2882536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.