Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18079160›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of physiology2008

Anticipatory changes in human motoneuron discharge patterns during motor preparation.

Yann Duclos, Annie Schmied, Boris Burle, Henri Burnet, Christiane Rossi-Durand

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of physiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Long-term neural correlates of reversible fear learning in the lateral amygdala.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  7. Influence of cueing on the preparation and execution of untrained and trained complex motor responses.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Role of corticospinal suppression during motor preparation.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2009
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yann DuclosLaboratoire de Plasticité et Physio Pathologie de Motricité (P3M), Unité Mixte de Recherche 6196, Aix-Marseille Université/CNRS, France.
Annie Schmied
Boris Burle
Henri Burnet
Christiane Rossi-Durand

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The influence of motor preparation on human motoneuron activity was studied by combining single motor unit recording techniques with reaction-time (RT) methods. The tonic activity of wrist extensor motor units associated with voluntary isometric contractions was analysed during preparation for a ballistic wrist extensor muscle contraction, using a time preparation procedure. Two durations of the preparatory period elapsing between the warning signal and the response signal were used in separate blocks of trials: a short preparatory period (1 s) allowing optimum time preparation, and a longer, non-optimum one (3 s). Changes in motoneuron tonic discharge patterns not associated with any changes in the force output were observed during the preparatory period, which suggests that these changes were subtle enough to prevent any changes in muscle contraction from occurring before the forthcoming movement. The changes observed were a lengthening of the mean interspike interval (ISI) and a decrease in the ISI variability. These data confirm that inhibitory mechanisms are activated during motor preparation and suggest that spinal inhibitory mechanisms are involved in the preparatory processes. The mechanisms possibly involved, such as presynaptic inhibition, disfacilitation processes or AHP conductance changes, are discussed. The fact that the preparation-induced effects on motoneuron activity were particularly prominent during the last part of the 3 s preparatory period suggests that they were probably related to the neural processes underlying temporal estimation. The anticipatory changes in motoneuron activity observed here during preparation for action provide evidence that central influences act on spinal motoneurons well before it is time to act.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMotor NeuronsMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalReaction TimeSynaptic TransmissionTime FactorsWrist

Identifiers

PMID18079160
PMCPMC2375638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.