Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18078354›Full record

ReviewMolecular diagnosis & therapy2007

Cancer pharmacogenomics: role of DNA repair genetic polymorphisms in individualizing cancer therapy.

Lucy Gossage, Srinivasan Madhusudan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Cancers · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Association of XRCC3 and XPD751 SNP with efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucy GossageAcademic Unit of Oncology, School of Molecular Medical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham University Hospitals, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, England.
Srinivasan Madhusudan
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolving field of cancer pharmacogenomics uses genetic profiling to predict the response of tumor and normal tissue to therapy. The narrow therapeutic index and heterogeneity of patient responses to chemotherapy and radiotherapy implies that the efficacy of these treatments could, potentially, be significantly enhanced by improving our understanding of the genetic bases for interindividual differences in their effects. The cytotoxicity of both chemotherapy and radiotherapy is to a large extent directly related to their ability to induce DNA damage. The ability of cancer cells to recognize and repair this damage contributes to therapeutic resistance. On the other hand, suboptimal DNA repair in normal tissue may negatively impact on normal tissue tolerance. More than 130 genes have been identified that are associated with human DNA repair, and single nucleotide polymorphisms of several of the DNA repair genes have been described recently. In this article, we present the current evidence implicating variations within DNA repair genes as important predictive and prognostic markers in cancer. We review evidence suggesting DNA repair genetic polymorphisms may significantly influence the clinical response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and may influence normal tissue tolerance to cancer treatments.

Indexed as

DNA RepairHumansNeoplasmsPharmacogeneticsPolymorphism, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID18078354
OpenAlexW2321361235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.