Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18077633›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2008

Candida krusei, a multidrug-resistant opportunistic fungal pathogen: geographic and temporal trends from the ARTEMIS DISK Antifungal Surveillance Program, 2001 to 2005.

M A Pfaller, D J Diekema, D L Gibbs, V A Newell, E Nagy, S Dobiasova, M Rinaldi, R Barton, A Veselov, Global Antifungal Surveillance Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Species Distribution and Determinants ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring the Mechanism of Tannic Acid AgainstPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Genomic Insights ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Role ofCancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2025
    Review
  14. Twenty-Year Course of Antifungal Resistance inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  15. Genomic analyses reveal high diversity and rapid evolution ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The Antimicrobial Resistance ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

M A PfallerMedical Microbiology Division, C606 GH, Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA. michael-pfaller@uiowa.edu
D J Diekema
D L Gibbs
V A Newell
E Nagy
S Dobiasova
M Rinaldi
R Barton
A Veselov
Global Antifungal Surveillance Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida krusei is well known as a fungal pathogen for patients with hematologic malignancies and for transplant recipients. Using the ARTEMIS Antifungal Surveillance Program database, we describe geographic and temporal trends in the isolation of C. krusei from clinical specimens and the in vitro susceptibilities of 3,448 isolates to voriconazole as determined by CLSI (formerly NCCLS) disk diffusion testing. In addition, we report the in vitro susceptibilities of bloodstream infection isolates of C. krusei to amphotericin B (304 isolates), flucytosine (254 isolates), anidulafungin (121 isolates), caspofungin (300 isolates), and micafungin (102 isolates) as determined by CLSI broth microdilution methods. Geographic differences in isolation were apparent; the highest frequency of isolation was seen for the Czech Republic (7.6%) and the lowest for Indonesia, South Korea, and Thailand (0 to 0.3%). Overall, 83% of isolates were susceptible to voriconazole, ranging from 74.8% in Latin America to 92.3% in North America. C. krusei was most commonly isolated from hematology-oncology services, where only 76.7% of isolates were susceptible to voriconazole. There was no evidence of increasing resistance of C. krusei to voriconazole from 2001 to 2005. Decreased susceptibilities to amphotericin B (MIC at which 90% of isolates were inhibited [MIC(90)], 4 microg/ml) and flucytosine (MIC(90), 16 microg/ml) were noted, whereas 100% of isolates were inhibited by < or =2 microg/ml of anidulafungin (MIC(90), 0.06 microg/ml), micafungin (MIC(90), 0.12 microg/ml) or caspofungin (MIC(90), 0.25 microg/ml). C. krusei is an uncommon but multidrug-resistant fungal pathogen. Among the systemically active antifungal agents, the echinocandins appear to be the most active against this important pathogen.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, FungalAfricaAntifungal AgentsAsiaCandidaCandidiasisEuropeGeographyHematologic NeoplasmsHumansLatin AmericaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle EastNorth AmericaAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID18077633
PMCPMC2238087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.