Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18077382›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2007

Life-history traits drive the evolutionary rates of mammalian coding and noncoding genomic elements.

Sergey I Nikolaev, Juan I Montoya-Burgos, Konstantin Popadin, Leila Parand, Elliott H Margulies, National Institutes of Health Intramural Sequencing Center Comparative Sequencing Program, Stylianos E Antonarakis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Negative Selection inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Many human RNA viruses show extraordinarily stringent selective constraints on protein evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sergey I NikolaevDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva Medical School, 1 Rue Michel-Servet, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland. sergey.nikolaev@medecine.unige.ch
Juan I Montoya-Burgos
Konstantin Popadin
Leila Parand
Elliott H Margulies
National Institutes of Health Intramural Sequencing Center Comparative Sequencing Program
Stylianos E Antonarakis

Funding

Identifying and Characterizing Functional Elements in the Human GenomeZ01HG200341 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MARGULIES, ELLIOTT · 2007 to 2008
$1.5M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comprehensive phylogenetic framework is indispensable for investigating the evolution of genomic features in mammals as a whole, and particularly in humans. Using the ENCODE sequence data, we estimated mammalian neutral evolutionary rates and selective pressures acting on conserved coding and noncoding elements. We show that neutral evolutionary rates can be explained by the generation time (GT) hypothesis. Accordingly, primates (especially humans), having longer GTs than other mammals, display slower rates of neutral evolution. The evolution of constrained elements, particularly of nonsynonymous sites, is in agreement with the expectations of the nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution. We show that rates of nonsynonymous substitutions (dN) depend on the population size of a species. The results are robust to the exclusion of hypermutable CpG prone sites. The average rate of evolution in conserved noncoding sequences (CNCs) is 1.7 times higher than in nonsynonymous sites. Despite this, CNCs evolve at similar or even lower rates than nonsynonymous sites in the majority of basal branches of the eutherian tree. This observation could be the result of an overall gradual or, alternatively, lineage-specific relaxation of CNCs. The latter hypothesis was supported by the finding that 3 of the 20 longest CNCs displayed significant relaxation of individual branches. This observation may explain why the evolution of CNCs fits the expectations of the nearly neutral theory less well than the evolution of nonsynonymous sites.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenetic CodeSelection, GeneticAnimalsConserved SequenceDatabases, GeneticDNA, IntergenicGenomeGenome, HumanHumansSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Intergenic

Identifiers

PMID18077382
PMCPMC2154450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.