Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18077328›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2007

Mapping dynamic protein interactions in MAP kinase signaling using live-cell fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy and imaging.

Brian D Slaughter, Joel W Schwartz, Rong Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Protein-Protein Interaction Prediction for Targeted Protein Degradation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. FRET Microscopy in Yeast.Biosensors · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Single-cell dynamics and variability of MAPK activity in a yeast differentiation pathway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian D SlaughterStowers Institute for Medical Research, 1000 East 50th Street, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.
Joel W Schwartz
Rong Li
Stowers Institute for Medical Research · US

Funding

Mechanisms of cell polarization in yeastR01GM057063 · NIGMS · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI LI, RONG · 1998 to 2015
$5.3M
Advanced imaging tools to examine interactions, dynamics of secretory componenetsF32GM077923 · NIGMS · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI SLAUGHTER, BRIAN · 2007 to 2008
$96k
NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM077923NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM077923-01A1NIGMS NIH HHS GM057063NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy (FCCS), and photon counting histograms (PCH) are fluctuation methods that emerged recently as potentially useful tools for obtaining parameters of molecular dynamics, interactions, and oligomerization in vivo. Here, we report the successful implementation of FCS, FCCS, and PCH in live yeast cells using fluorescent protein-tagged proteins expressed from their native chromosomal loci, examining cytosolic dynamics and interactions among components of the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade, a widely occurring signaling motif, in response to mating pheromone. FCS analysis detailed the diffusion characteristics and mobile concentrations of MAPK proteins. FCCS analysis using EGFP and mCherry-tagged protein pairs observed the interactions of Ste7 (MAPK kinase) with the MAPKs, Fus3 or Kss1, and of the scaffold protein, Ste5, with Ste7 and Ste11 (MAPK kinase kinase) in the cytosol, providing in vivo constants of their binding equilibrium. The interaction of Ste5 with Fus3 in the cytosol was below the limit of detection, suggesting a weak interaction, if it exists, with K(d) >400-500 nM. Using PCH, we show that cytosolic Ste5 were mostly monomers. Artificial dimerization of Ste5, as confirmed by PCH, using a dimerizing tag, stimulated the interaction between Ste5 and Fus3. Native Ste5 was found to bind Fus3 preferentially at the cortex in pheromone-treated cells, as detected by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). These results provide a quantitative spatial map of MAPK complexes in vivo and directly support the model that membrane association and regulation of the Ste5 scaffold are critical steps in MAPK activation.

Indexed as

Fungal ProteinsMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesProtein Interaction MappingRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSignal TransductionSpectrometry, FluorescenceYeastsFungal ProteinsMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesRecombinant Fusion Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18077328
PMCPMC2154429
OpenAlexW1979218516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.