Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18076766›Full record

Trial reportJournal of translational medicine2007

Phase II study of intraperitoneal recombinant interleukin-12 (rhIL-12) in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (residual disease < 1 cm) associated with ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Renato Lenzi, Robert Edwards, Carl June, Michael V Seiden, Michael E Garcia, Michael Rosenblum, Ralph S Freedman

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of translational medicine, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Nanocapsule Delivery of IL-12.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Renato LenziDepartment of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M,D, Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA. rlenzi@mdanderson.org
Robert Edwards
Carl June
Michael V Seiden
Michael E Garcia
Michael Rosenblum
Ralph S Freedman
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Phase I Studies of Targeted Anti-Cancer TherapiesU01CA062461 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI YAO, JAMES C · 1994 to 2013
$7.2M
Phase ii intraperitoneal rhIL 12R21CA091555 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI FREEDMAN, RALPH S · 2001 to 2002
$578k
NCI NIH HHS 5R21-CA091555NCI NIH HHS R21 CA091555NCI NIH HHS U01 CA062461NCI NIH HHS UO1 CA062461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacokinetic advantages of intraperitoneal (IP) rhIL-12, tumor response to IP delivery of other cytokines as well as its potential anti-angiogenic effect provided the rationale for further evaluation of IPrhIL-12 in patients with persistent ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma.

methodsA phase 2 multi-institutional trial (NCI Study #2251) of IP rIL-12 (300 nanogram/Kg weekly) was conducted in patients with ovarian carcinoma or primary peritoneal carcinoma. Patients treated with primary therapy for ovarian cancer who had no extraabdominal/parenchymal disease or bulky peritoneal disease were eligible. Four to 8 weeks from last chemotherapy, eligible patients underwent a laparotomy/laparoscopy. Patients with residual disease < or = 1 cm were registered for the treatment phase 2-5 weeks post surgery. The effect of IP rIL-12 on the expression of TNFalpha , INFalpha , IL-10, IP-10, IL-8, FGF, VEGF was also studied.

resultsThirty-four patients were registered for the first screening phase of the study. Median age was 56.6 years (range: 31-71); 12 completed the second phase and were evaluable for response/toxicity. Performance scores of IL-12 treated patients were 0 (11 pts) and 1 (1 pt). There were no treatment related deaths, peritonitis or significant catheter related complications. Toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia (1), grade 3 fatigue (4), headache (2), myalgia (2), non-neutropenic fever (1), drug fever (1), back pain (1), and dizziness (1). The best response observed was SD. Two patients had SD and 9 had PD, and 1 was evaluable for toxicity only. Peritoneal fluid cytokine measurements demonstrated a > or = 3 fold relative increase post-rhIL-12: IFN-gamma, 5/5 pts; TNF-alpha , 1/5; IL-10, 4/5; IL-8, 5/5; and VEGF, 3/5. IP10 levels were increased in 5/5 patients. Cytokine response profiles suggest either NK or T-cell mediated effects of IP rhIL-12. Cytokine/chemokine results also suggest a pleiotropic response since proteins with potential for either anti-tumor (IFN-gamma , IP-10) or pro-tumor growth effects (VEGF, IL-8) were detected.

conclusionIP IL-12 can safely be administered at this dose and schedule to patients after first line chemotherapy for ovarian/peritoneal carcinoma. The maximum response was stable disease. Future IP therapies with rhIL-12 will require better understanding and control of pleiotropic effects of IL-12.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAscitic FluidClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicCytokinesFemaleHumansInterleukin-12Middle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualOvarian NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsRecombinant ProteinsSafetyCytokinesInterleukin-12Recombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID18076766
PMCPMC2248163
OpenAlexW2120026414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.