Trial reportCroatian medical journal2007

Effect of rosiglitazone and metformin on insulin resistance in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy containing protease inhibitor: randomized prospective controlled clinical trial.

Anja Silic, Andrej Janez, Janez Tomazic, Primoz Karner, Ludvik Vidmar, Prem Sharma, Mojca Maticic

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Croatian medical journal, 2007. The graph read 2 numbers from its abstract, feeding 3 cells of the map, but none could be read as for or against, so it casts no vote. It reports registered trial NCT00483392. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

2numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

Glycemic controlcomparator not stated · t2dfeeds 3 cells of the map
reduced -0.62P<0.001
HOMA indicated that rosiglitazone significantly reduced insulin resistance from 11.3+/-1.03 to 4.0+/-0.95 (P<0.001), compared with metformin which reduced it from 11.9+/-0.73 to 5.7+/-0.62 (P<0.001).
Glycemic controlcomparator not stated · t2dfeeds 3 cells of the map
reduced -0.95P<0.001
HOMA indicated that rosiglitazone significantly reduced insulin resistance from 11.3+/-1.03 to 4.0+/-0.95 (P<0.001), compared with metformin which reduced it from 11.9+/-0.73 to 5.7+/-0.62 (P<0.001).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Insulin×glycemic control

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

40 readable studies in this cell: 14 favour the treatment, 14 find no difference, 13 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.50contested · 9 families support, 6 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
0 · no effect
NCT036893742,274 enrolled · 2018
Δ -0.29-0.38 to -0.20
NCT037306622,002 enrolled · 2018
Δ -0.99-1.13 to -0.86
NCT013360231,663 enrolled · 2011
Treatment contrast -0.64-0.75 to -0.53
NCT038829701,444 enrolled · 2019
Δ -0.86-1.00 to -0.72
NCT045379231,428 enrolled · 2020
Δ -1.10-1.24 to -0.97
NCT032680051,264 enrolled · 2017
Δ -0.04-0.11 to 0.03
NCT020581471,170 enrolled · 2014
Δ -0.78-0.90 to -0.67
NCT021289321,089 enrolled · 2014
Δ -0.81-0.96 to -0.67
NCT009606611,036 enrolled · 2009
Δ -0.04-0.18 to 0.11
NCT00856986987 enrolled · 2009
Δ -0.52-0.68 to -0.36
NCT01117350978 enrolled · 2010
Δ 2.54-3.88 to 8.93
NCT03214380933 enrolled · 2017
Δ 0.06-0.05 to 0.16

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

Metformin×glycemic control

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

40 readable studies in this cell: 42 favour the treatment, 12 find no difference, 7 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.84replicated · 32 families support, 6 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
NCT017190031,413 enrolled · 2012
Adjusted mean -0.72-0.95 to -0.48
NCT018093271,186 enrolled · 2013
Δ -0.40-0.59 to -0.21
NCT022730501,136 enrolled · 2014
Δ -0.89-1.08 to -0.69
NCT008598981,093 enrolled · 2009
Δ -0.53-0.74 to -0.32
Δ -0.85-43.8 to 26.7
NCT00643851994 enrolled · 2008
Δ -0.86-1.11 to -0.62
NCT01708902876 enrolled · 2012
Δ -1.00-1.23 to -0.78
NCT00676338820 enrolled · 2008
Δ -0.05-0.26 to 0.17
NCT01126580807 enrolled · 2010
Δ -0.22-0.36 to -0.08
NCT01023581784 enrolled · 2009
Δ -0.67-0.96 to -0.37
NCT01076088744 enrolled · 2010
Δ -0.84-1.15 to -0.52
NCT00386100688 enrolled · 2006
Δ -0.49-0.67 to -0.30

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

Thiazolidinediones×glycemic control

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

16 readable studies in this cell: 8 favour the treatment, 4 find no difference, 4 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.83established · 5 families support, 1 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the comparatorfavours the treatment →
0 · no effect
NCT00676338820 enrolled · 2008
Δ 0.10-0.15 to 0.35
NCT00839527685 enrolled · 2009
Δ 0.250.10 to 0.40
NCT00727857600 enrolled · 2007
Δ 0.840.50 to 1.18
NCT01076075427 enrolled · 2010
Δ -0.68-0.87 to -0.50
NCT00770653305 enrolled · 2007
Δ 0.16-0.02 to 0.33
NCT0158944577 enrolled · 2008
Δ -0.74-7.90 to 8.00
NCT0031865623 enrolled · 2005
Δ 5.02-0.32 to 10.4

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00483392 nacompleted

Treatment of Hyperglycaemia and Insulin Resistance in HIV Infected Patients

Registered outcomes2Posted comparisons0ConditionsInsulin ResistanceArmsmetformin, rosiglitazone
Open the trial in the graph
5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Methodological Errors in Clinical Studies Published by Medical Journals of Ex-Yugoslav Countries.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anja SilicFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Andrej Janez
Janez Tomazic
Primoz Karner
Ludvik Vidmar
Prem Sharma
Mojca Maticic
Ljubljana University Medical Centre · SIUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

aimTo evaluate and compare effects of 48-week treatment with rosiglitazone and metformin on insulin resistance in patients infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), containing a protease inhibitor.

methodsRandomized prospective controlled clinical trial enrolled 90 male patients infected with HIV and having impaired glucose tolerance and insulin resistance (fasting insulin concentration >20 mIU/L). The patients were randomly assigned into three groups; the first group receiving 4 mg rosiglitazone once a day, the second group receiving 500 mg metformin two times a day, and the third group serving as control without hypoglycemic treatment. The primary efficacy parameters were fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels compared between baseline and week. Data on insulin resistance and beta cell function were analyzed by the Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA).

resultsAfter 48 weeks of treatment, the fasting insulin concentration (+/-standard deviation) in rosiglitazone group significantly declined from 39.0+/-3.35 to 19.7+/-3.99 mIU/L (P<0.001; 49% decrease) and in metformin group from 40.3+/-2.29 to 29.2+/-2.82 mIU/L (P<0.001; 27% decrease). HOMA indicated that rosiglitazone significantly reduced insulin resistance from 11.3+/-1.03 to 4.0+/-0.95 (P<0.001), compared with metformin which reduced it from 11.9+/-0.73 to 5.7+/-0.62 (P<0.001). Insulin resistance was significantly lower in the rosiglitazone group after 48 weeks (P<0.001). Metformin significantly improved beta cell function (from 257.3+/-21.91 to 707.4+/-207.32; P<0.001), as did rosiglitazone as well (from 261.3+/-27.98 to 403.3+/-162.50; P<0.001), but the improvement in the metformin group was significantly better (P<0.001). However, metformin was more efficient in improving beta cell function (from 257.3+/-21.91 to 707.4+/-207.32) than rosiglitazone (from 261.3+/-27.98 to 403.3+/-162.50).

conclusionsBoth rosiglitazone and metformin were effective and well tolerated in HIV treated with protease inhibitor-containing HAART. Rosiglitazone significantly more reduced insulin resistance, while beta cell function was significantly better in patients on metformin. Both drugs may be considered as an appropriate therapy, with rosiglitazone being a better alternative in treating insulin resistance in this patient population. ClinicalTrials.gov trial registration number: NCT00483392.

Indexed as

Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveInsulin ResistanceAdolescentAdultBlood GlucoseDrug Administration ScheduleFastingFollow-Up StudiesGlucose Tolerance TestHIV InfectionsHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMaleMetforminMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinMetforminProtease InhibitorsRosiglitazoneThiazolidinediones

Identifiers

PMID18074413
PMCPMC2213797
OpenAlexW2111211095

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.