ArticleSurgical endoscopy2008
Long-term quality of life after endoscopic dilation of strictured colorectal or colocolonic anastomoses.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06036862 (A Prospective Clinical Study of Transanal and Transabdominal Combined Endoscopic Resection of Rectal Stenosis and Anal Reconstruction for Severe Rectal Anastomotic Stenosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Clinical Study of Transanal and Transabdominal Combined Endoscopic Resection of Rectal Stenosis and Anal Reconstruction for Severe Rectal Anastomotic Stenosis
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- A real-world study of endoscopic and fluoroscopic management of benign colorectal strictures: clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Analysis of treatment methods and relapse factors of postoperative anastomotic stenosis in colorectal cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Stricturoplasty with Linear Stapler: An Efficient Alternative for the Refractory Rectal Anastomotic Stricture.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2023Article
- Transanal and transabdominal combined endoscopic resection of rectal stenosis and anal reconstruction based on transanal endoscopic technique.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Endoscopic radial incision and cutting technique for treatment-naive stricture of colorectal anastomosis: Two case reports.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2020Article
- Role of endoscopic interventions and electroincision in benign anastomotic strictures following colorectal surgery.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Anastomotic stricture after ultralow anterior resection or intersphincteric resection for very low-lying rectal cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Article
- [Late complications and functional disorders after rectal resection : Prevention, detection and therapy].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2015Review
- Comparative study of balloon and metal olive dilators for endoscopic management of benign anastomotic rectal strictures: clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic balloon dilation is the first-line treatment for benign colorectal anastomotic strictures. We aimed to objectively assess its long-term results.
methodsGastrointestinal symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were assessed at long-term after balloon dilation of anastomotic strictures in 31 consecutive patients (excluding those with inflammatory bowel disease) as well as and controls, using the validated Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Most colectomies had been performed for benign diseases, with anastomoses located at the colorectal junction.
resultsCompleted surveys were collected from 81 subjects, including 27 study patients (response rate 87%), 27 surgical controls matched for age, gender, and indication of colectomy, and 27 healthy subjects. At a mean of 3.9 +/- 2.3 years after the first endoscopic balloon-dilation, study patients self-reported significantly more gastrointestinal symptoms than controls; these included frequent and urgent bowel movements, bloating, food restriction (p < or = 0.001, all comparisons), diarrhea, excessive passage of gas through the anus (p < 0.01, all comparisons), constipation, and abdominal pain (p < 0.05, all comparisons). Health-related quality of life was significantly impaired in study patients versus surgical controls and healthy subjects (GIQLI scores, 104 +/- 20, 119 +/- 24, and 121 +/- 16, respectively; p = 0.005). Impaired HRQoL subdimensions included gastrointestinal symptoms (p < 0.001), stress by treatment (p < 0.05), and emotional status (p = 0.08). HRQoL was independent of the delay between stricture dilation and the survey. Follow-up endoscopy (performed in 21/27 [78%] study patients, including the 7 patients with the lowest HRQoL, and 19 [70%] surgical controls) disclosed anastomoses larger than 13 mm in all cases.
conclusionsHealth-related quality of life is significantly impaired at long-term after standard balloon-dilation of benign anastomotic colorectal strictures as a result of gastrointestinal symptoms and stress by treatment. This impairment might be related to the fact that an anastomotic diameter > or = 13 mm, although commonly used to define successful endoscopic treatment, is insufficient to provide long-term symptom relief in some patients, or to other, yet to be identified, factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.