Evidence map›Paper›PMID 18074149›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2008

Randomised trial of oral versus sequential intravenous/oral cephalosporins in children with pyelonephritis.

Thomas J Neuhaus, Christoph Berger, Katja Buechner, Paloma Parvex, Gian Bischoff, Philippe Goetschel, Daniela Husarik, Ulrich Willi, Luciano Molinari, Christoph Rudin and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Antibiotics for acute pyelonephritis in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Urinary tract infections in children.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Acute pyelonephritis in children.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Treatment and prophylaxis in pediatric urinary tract infection.International journal of preventive medicine · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas J NeuhausDepartment of Nephrology, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Steinwiesstrasse 75, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland.
Christoph Berger
Katja Buechner
Paloma Parvex
Gian Bischoff
Philippe Goetschel
Daniela Husarik
Ulrich Willi
Luciano Molinari
Christoph Rudin
Alain Gervaix
Urs Hunziker
Sergio Stocker
Eric Girardin
David Nadal
University Children's Hospital Zurich · CHUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHKantonsspital Winterthur · CHHospital de Base · BRTriemli Hospital · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hypothesis was tested that oral antibiotic treatment in children with acute pyelonephritis and scintigraphy-documented lesions is equally as efficacious as sequential intravenous/oral therapy with respect to the incidence of renal scarring. A randomised multi-centre trial was conducted in 365 children aged 6 months to 16 years with bacterial growth in cultures from urine collected by catheter. The children were assigned to receive either oral ceftibuten (9 mg/kg once daily) for 14 days or intravenous ceftriaxone (50 mg/kg once daily) for 3 days followed by oral ceftibuten for 11 days. Only patients with lesions detected on acute-phase dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy underwent follow-up scintigraphy. Efficacy was evaluated by the rate of renal scarring after 6 months on follow-up scintigraphy. Of 219 children with lesions on acute-phase scintigraphy, 152 completed the study; 80 (72 females, median age 2.2 years) were given ceftibuten and 72 (62 females, median age 1.6 years) were given ceftriaxone/ceftibuten. Patients in the intravenous/oral group had significantly higher C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations at baseline and larger lesion(s) on acute-phase scintigraphy. Follow-up scintigraphy showed renal scarring in 21/80 children treated with ceftibuten and 33/72 with ceftriaxone/ceftibuten (p = 0.01). However, after adjustment for the confounding variables (CRP and size of acute-phase lesion), no significant difference was observed for renal scarring between the two groups (p = 0.2). Renal scarring correlated with the extent of the acute-phase lesion (r = 0.60, p < 0.0001) and the grade of vesico-ureteric reflux (r = 0.31, p = 0.03), and was more frequent in refluxing renal units (p = 0.04). The majority of patients, i.e. 44 in the oral group and 47 in the intravenous/oral group, were managed as out-patients. Side effects were not observed. From this study, we can conclude that once-daily oral ceftibuten for 14 days yielded comparable results to sequential ceftriaxone/ceftibuten treatment in children aged 6 months to 16 years with DMSA-documented acute pyelonephritis and it allowed out-patient management in the majority of these children.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftibutenCeftriaxoneCephalosporinsChildChild, PreschoolDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansInfantInjections, IntravenousMalePyelonephritisRadionuclide ImagingAnti-Bacterial AgentsCeftibutenCeftriaxoneCephalosporinsTechnetium Tc 99m Dimercaptosuccinic Acid

Identifiers

PMID18074149
OpenAlexW2039101659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.